Should Alabama football players join the players' union?
- Thread starter Nate Harris
- Start date
If Detroit is any indication. This won't go well.
I do find it odd that players act like captives. They get plenty of benefits. I walked on the UA track team over a decade ago and had plenty of benevits, scholarships
even more so.
I Have no sympathy and don't support this.
I do find it odd that players act like captives. They get plenty of benefits. I walked on the UA track team over a decade ago and had plenty of benevits, scholarships
even more so.
I Have no sympathy and don't support this.
UNION...
'WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING UNION'... (My apologies to 'Blazing Saddles'
Pardon my English, but it ain't gonna happen as long as it's amateur athletics.
'WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING UNION'... (My apologies to 'Blazing Saddles'
Pardon my English, but it ain't gonna happen as long as it's amateur athletics.
Maybe they need more player input into safety issues, travel time and missed classes, and total practice time.
I see you have never had dealings with a union. Like the one that used to represent steel workers.
Used to...........as most of the mills are closed. (Yes, I know Fairfield still rolls.)
I've had 2 jobs that were unionized and I was laid off from both of them (the only times I've ever been laid off). The only thing that mattered to the unions in both instances was hire date. People who sucked at there job were safe while I had worked my butt off but was shown the door because I was hired last. Management's hands were tied, they had to do what the union said. I hate unions!
Let's keep the conversation as football-centric as possible or this thread will have to move to NS.
I just am amazed at how many people can't see the Pandoras box you open if you pay them and they unionize....
If You do that College Football will be gone in fifteen years.
I get the logic for it. It's big business, etc....
But the logic against it is overwhelming.
If you pay these kids $500/month....within ten years it will be $5000/month....
Then you have to pay money to the female athletes the same amount for their sports.
If you unionize, then you may be paying $20k, month.....and what happens when they only are offered $12k, and they strike.
Do you pay the backup kicker the same as the Starting QB? It's a union, you got no choice. Do you pay starters more? Then, if the coach decides to bench the starter, do you cut their pay?
Then, if they do get benched, can they sue for lost wages?
I'm telling you, if you love college football, this is a bad bad idea
If You do that College Football will be gone in fifteen years.
I get the logic for it. It's big business, etc....
But the logic against it is overwhelming.
If you pay these kids $500/month....within ten years it will be $5000/month....
Then you have to pay money to the female athletes the same amount for their sports.
If you unionize, then you may be paying $20k, month.....and what happens when they only are offered $12k, and they strike.
Do you pay the backup kicker the same as the Starting QB? It's a union, you got no choice. Do you pay starters more? Then, if the coach decides to bench the starter, do you cut their pay?
Then, if they do get benched, can they sue for lost wages?
I'm telling you, if you love college football, this is a bad bad idea
Three questions: (1) Where is the money coming from to pay ALL the players, from the school or the ncaa?
(2) Does the player have a choice between a scholly or paycheck?
(3) Is it a set amount? Or does each sport set a different level?
I can see a BIG conflict if a football player gets $1,500 per month and a member of the Softball team getting $250. Once it starts it won't end. What happens to the schools that are going into the RED on the sports teams? If they close their programs due to the addition costs - think of the people that won't be able to go to college?
(2) Does the player have a choice between a scholly or paycheck?
(3) Is it a set amount? Or does each sport set a different level?
I can see a BIG conflict if a football player gets $1,500 per month and a member of the Softball team getting $250. Once it starts it won't end. What happens to the schools that are going into the RED on the sports teams? If they close their programs due to the addition costs - think of the people that won't be able to go to college?
We are witnessing the end of college athletics as we know it. In 5-10 years, college athletics will no longer exist.
It is truly unbelievable how the sport if fball is changing. Just one question, "Are these guys FORCED to play fball and accept scholarships that can get into worth over 100K?"
If a free education and a chance to play college fball is soooooo tough go get an application for a job at TCBY. This is getting to be a joke!
If a free education and a chance to play college fball is soooooo tough go get an application for a job at TCBY. This is getting to be a joke!
I think it is more about being seen as a slave in the name of "fair" competition. Can a regular scholarship student who writes a book, a song or whatever to become famous make money off of that fame without losing their scholarship? Hey, that merit scholar at Stanford just got kicked out of the molecular biology program because he took money for talking at a Biotech conference! Universities will not and should not pay other than the scholarships, but the athletes should be able to profit from their fame and so on.
Latest threads
-
BREAKING Ft Hood on lock down ( active shooter)- Started by bamaga
- Replies: 0
-
Indian billionaire dies after swallowing bee during his polo match- Started by BamaNation
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
Nolan Ryan threw 235 pitches in 13 innings 51 years ago today
- Started by BamaNation
- Replies: 8
-
