Does anyone have a pic of it? I was traveling at the time and didnt get to see it or any reviews. He said he got his arm under it.
dont have a pic but it hit the groundDoes anyone have a pic of it? I was traveling at the time and didnt get to see it or any reviews. He said he got his arm under it.
^^^ This ^^^It more than likely did hit the ground, but to me, the refs were unwilling to overturn a call unless it was totally conclusive evidence until that play, and then overturned a play where there was doubt. No view clearly showed the ball hit the ground, nor did any view clearly show Milliner get his arm under the ball, as I recall.
I respectfully disagree. His right arm was under the ball.Good call. DM should have caught it, but it went through his hands.
Then you watched a different game or was too inebriated to see. One of the angles clearly showed it hit the ground.I respectfully disagree. His right arm was under the ball.
Did the ball hit the ground of did he use the ground to complete the catch? The ball can touch the ground
you must have control before it touches the ground. In this case he had his hands on either side of the ball, the ball touched the ground and it moved as you could see from a side angle. Incomplete per the college rule.Did the ball hit the ground of did he use the ground to complete the catch? The ball can touch the ground
lolThen you watched a different game or was too inebriated to see. One of the angles clearly showed it hit the ground.
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
To be clear about the point that I was making, I responded to a poster who said the ball went through Milliner's hands. While the nose of the ball may have touched the ground, Milliner did have the ball pinned between his right arm and his body. I did not take a position on whether or not the pass was complete.Then you watched a different game or was too inebriated to see. One of the angles clearly showed it hit the ground.
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
Gary must have had a direct line upstairs when he would bark out that "yeah they reviewed that last one" after a bad call for BamaBall hit the ground, no INT. What bothers me though, and I know I am beating a dead horse here, but it appeared they were only selectively reviewing plays. Tons of time on the no pick, no time on the tip pass/PI call. No review of Lacy and forward progress on the goal etc.
As I said in a different thread that was not Ritter's crew, the crew was mixed which I do not like for big games like this.I like Tom Ritter and his crew. I thought they did great. The replay booth? Not so much. Ritter doesnt see the review he just does what they tell him