Chip Kelly can't win the big one's or at least when it really really matters? Always seems to drop one when the Ducks aren't supposed to. What do y'all think, much of a comparison to stoops?
:biggrin:Well they both like the visor look, so there's that
So losing to Stanford tonight wasn't unpredictable? Weren't the Ducks a 17 pt fav?Poor comparison. Kelly is a great offensive coach and the ducks are only relevant because of his offense. Stoops had/has tons more talent and chokes at even the most unpredictable moments.
I don't make the spread, so I can't comment on that part. I will say Stanford is a very good team that matched up well with UO and I'm not shocked by the result. Stanford did beat a then #1 USC earlier this year and will likely win their division that they share with the Ducks.So losing to Stanford tonight wasn't unpredictable? Weren't the Ducks a 17 pt fav?
Talent wise, Oregon was superior to Boise State in 2009. Although, I realize it was his first game as head coach.Stoops has lost some simply baffling games. Kelly's losses are understandable. This Stanford loss is understandable. So was last season's USC loss. Stoops lost to some mediocre teams and has been embarrassed in some bowl games. Not the same.
Yeah in the SEC. Oregon has it SO EASY in the PAC 12 and they blew it against Stanford.To be fair, it's very hard to go undefeated.