Not to hijack this post and turn it into a Heisman discussion, but since it's already been brought up.....
To me, the Heisman ain't what it used to be. Even though i think it's cool that we finally got one with Ingram, it has become nothing but a popularity contest. Of course, you have to be good to be in the discussion, but think about it this way: If we're trying to say the winner is the "best" or "most valuable" player in college football, then who are the true best judges of bestowing that designation? I say it's the people who fork out a ton of their hard earned dollars to pay players to play in the pro's - in other words, the people who draft you to the NFL. Having said that, I seriously doubt that any of the 3 Heisman finalists would be the number 1 pick in the draft (and I know Johnny isn't eligible yet, i mean whenever a player enters the draft), which is another way of saying you're the "best player". I know some will have strong opinions to the contrary, but you have to admit - if you were picking players for your own personal college team, would you start with either of these 3 guys? I wouldn't. I might like to have them on my team, but they wouldn't be the first pick. Just sayin'.