If we win, that will be almost 20% of the NCs over that time period, backloaded, of course...Bama has 3, working on 4 rings in this time period...ND has?
Hm. Those are some terrific results!If we win, that will be almost 20% of the NCs over that time period, backloaded, of course...
Are you certain that we had to vacate wins in 2009? That would have nullified the national title if that were the case.College Football Data Warehouse has:
Alabama 182-97 (with the '93 forfeits and '09 vacated wins)
Notre Dame 194-98-2
He meant '07.Are you certain that we had to vacate wins in 2009? That would have nullified the national title if that were the case.
Is this stuff the best you have??1 working on 2
I meant the vacated wins over the textbook scandal from 2005-2007. The case was final in 2009. I should have been more specific.Are you certain that we had to vacate wins in 2009? That would have nullified the national title if that were the case.
what's your point?? it sounds like you are trying hard to make it appeared that in spite of ND 25 years of mediocrity, the fighting irish are on par with Bama in the last 20 years or so. in case you forgot, the NCAA has a true disdain for the Tide during the late 90's and in 2007 which is just the complete opposite for their beloved golden domers. and despite those setbacks and probation years, Bama was still alive and kicking. since you brought up 1988, Bama has 3 NCs since that time and is working on #4. those are the only numbers that really matter in Tuscaloosa!!From 1988-2012 both teams have the same #of losses: 98. Thanks to the textbook scandal, ND has more wins 206-194.
I'm sorry man, but this seems like something out of the 'barn. (Auburn)From 1988-2012 both teams have the same #of losses: 98. Thanks to the textbook scandal, ND has more wins 206-194.
Meaningless. Good luck on the 7th. :BigA:From 1988-2012 both teams have the same #of losses: 98. Thanks to the textbook scandal, ND has more wins 206-194.