GREAT read. Thanks for posting!
Roll Tide Roll!!!
All this talk of Bama being a dynasty makes me nervous. Kind of like how we could beat a NFL team earlier this year.
Bama 867-314-44 72.6% On the field
2012 SEC CHAMPIONS
BACK TO BACK NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
Yes I was surprised it was a good article.
Yes, the same Dennis Dodd who retroactively took back our last two national titles under four-team playoff scenarios now has us the greatest dynasty ever. Well if really believes that then why did he take our titles away in theory? Should I guess he's one of those who writes columns both ways so whatever happens he can say he's right?
Maybe its just me, but I have an issue with USC in 2003. how can you be awarded the NC when you didn't even played the title game??? did Michigan know that they were involved in an NC game??
the AP is not the BCS. that's the reason why the BCS was concieved. I realize the controversy surrounding the final votes in the AP and Coaches's Poll, but the fact remains that the crystal ball is in Baton Rouge not in L.A. period.
I guess when I watched the LSU/OK NC game, it was really something else??
and one more thing, USC won the 2004 BCSNC, but was later stripped. so essentially and technically USC does not have 1 BCSNC title. zero.
Bottom line, I would like to have USC remove from all his dynasty chatter. they played in 2 consecutive BCSNCG in 2004-05. that was a watershed moment in their history. winning 1 and losing 1. that does not constitute a dynasty, no matter many how wins you accumulated during those 3-4 years( esp. playing in the PAC 12) Boise St. has an impressive win record over the last 5 years, are they a dynasty??
off my rant.
Last edited by sanjosecrimson; January 3rd, 2013 at 12:22 PM.
Keeping my comments to myself to prevent jinxing us....