So they want to claim 1910, 1913, 1914, 1958, 1983, 1993, and 2004
1910- Auburn 6-1
Teams with better record: Illinois, Colorado College, Colorado, Pittsburgh, Harvard, Washington, Vanderbilt, Navy, Southern Cal (and many others that had the same record or identical win percentage).
Services awarding Auburn NC: none
Analysis: Let's face it, Southern football was a joke until the 20s, and we really probably shouldn't have beaten Washington in '26. Harvard, Illinois, Pitt, Washington and USC would have SLAUGHTERED Auburn. Auburn lost one game 0-9 to Texas, despite that being the only game they surrendered a point (which wasn't that uncommon back then)
1913- Auburn 8-0
Teams with better record: Nebraska, Harvard
Services awarding Auburn NC: Billingsley
Analysis: A lot more legitimate claim than 1910. Once again, though. Harvard would have slaughtered them
1914- Auburn 8-0-1
Teams with better record: Tennessee, Army, Texas, Illinois
Services awarding Auburn NC: none
Analysis: No legitimate claim. It's really as simple as that
1958- Auburn 9-0-1
Teams with better record: LSU (Iowa also won NC)
Services awarding Auburn NC: None
Analysis: Auburn tied Georgia Tech who went 5-4-1.
I will admit that they have a legit claim to 1983 and possibly 2004 (knowing all we know now). In short, if they feel compelled to add 1913, 1983, and 2004.... so be it. But the other 4 NC claims are simply illegitimate
