Ole Miss's New Uniforms Are Hideous

Crimson57s

1st Team
Aug 18, 2012
557
0
0
I think their white uniform with dark blue numbers/trim looks like some hand-me down outfit from Penn State.

It seems many teams this year are tinkering with their uniform design, when there are bigger things to work on.
 

ValuJet

Moderator
Sep 28, 2000
22,626
19
0
The uniforms aren't bad - if you're a new coach at a high school and trying to mix it up a little bit.

I don't know too many college uni's that are as deeply rooted in a traditional look as those gray pants were.

Thumbs down on the changes.
 

ValuJet

Moderator
Sep 28, 2000
22,626
19
0
...and those North Carolina jerseys up there look like they belong to a girl's basketball team.
 

JIB

Suspended
Nov 2, 2011
1,431
0
0
Sterrett
I always liked the Ole Miss jersey. They changed the shoulder stripe, which I'm not big on. They put the dumb name on the pant too.

No reason to mess with what was one of the best looking jersies in the conference.
 

pyro

Suspended
Nov 9, 2004
1,289
0
0
37
Winchester TN
Why in the world would they take away the red jersey's and gray pants? I always thought that was as good looking a uniform as there was. But these four combo's are awful in my opinion. sip

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf...essed-ole-miss-uniforms-163841240--ncaaf.html
The real reason they took away the grey is the same reason they took away the mascot, took away the dixie song, and the same reason the state of Georgia removed the Confederate flag from there state flag. It has nothing to do with getting new uniforms really.
 

RedStar

Hall of Fame
Jan 28, 2005
9,628
0
0
39
The Shoals, AL
The real reason they took away the grey is the same reason they took away the mascot, took away the dixie song, and the same reason the state of Georgia removed the Confederate flag from there state flag. It has nothing to do with getting new uniforms really.
But aren't the pants in the first picture gray?
 

TLD

New Member
Aug 5, 2012
12
0
0
They never quit being the Rebels. They just did away with Col. Reb to be PC. Col. Reb was replaced with a black bear mascot for the sidelines, but they never became the Black Bears.
Thanks, Kevin4Bama...there has always seemed to be difficulty in people grasping what the Rebel / Black Bear change was...as you stated, they never quit being the Rebels...just switched the actual physical sideline mascot. My son goes to Ole Miss...so I was able to keep track of the voting, etc of the mascot switch.
 

CapstoneGrad06

Hall of Fame
Jan 19, 2006
7,105
0
0
41
Houston, Texas
The elephant is more accepted and integrated in our program than the black bear is with them. Though I don't buy or see a lot of Ole Miss merchandise. I think I've seen one piece of their merchandise that has the Black Bear on it. With us the Elephant is used a lot, especially with t-shirts.
While Alabama didn't officially have an elephant as a mascot until 1979, it had been associated with us since the 1920s. I can't see the Ole Miss black bear being accepted overnight. Especially with a popular, longstanding mascot being removed.
 

CapstoneGrad06

Hall of Fame
Jan 19, 2006
7,105
0
0
41
Houston, Texas
It was actually humorous at the Ole Miss - Bama game last year. Someone showed up as the Col Reb mascot and was on the Ole Miss sideline until someone recognized it and escorted them off.
Wasn't there also a guy who suck onto their sideline and pretended to be a trainer? No one realized until afterwords when his twitter or blog chronicled the experience.
 

gwilliams

1st Team
Aug 29, 2011
462
0
0
I'm trying to understand why there seems to be a trend toward so many new looks in uniforms. Sure, schools get endorsement money for wearing a logo. But why would the uniform maker add the extra expense of all new designs?
The makers, underarmour and nike, maybe have marketing research that suggests the new designs make their logos be noticed (even if unconsciously) more than old designs?????

I tell ya' what, the new OleMiss uniforms make me want to run out and by some Nike stuff, right now. :rolleyes:
 

RTR91

Super Moderator
Nov 23, 2007
39,407
6
0
Prattville
I'm trying to understand why there seems to be a trend toward so many new looks in uniforms. Sure, schools get endorsement money for wearing a logo. But why would the uniform maker add the extra expense of all new designs?
The makers, underarmour and nike, maybe have marketing research that suggests the new designs make their logos be noticed (even if unconsciously) more than old designs?????

I tell ya' what, the new OleMiss uniforms make me want to run out and by some Nike stuff, right now. :rolleyes:
It's pretty simple really. New uniforms means fans want to buy the new uniforms, which equals more money.

And you aren't the targeted audience, so they don't expect you to want to go buy it. Why buy that new Nike championship shirt in January? It's just like the previous one.:rolleye2:
 

New Posts

Latest threads

TideFans.shop - NEW Stuff!

TideFans.shop - Get YOUR Bama Gear HERE!”></a>
<br />

<!--/ END TideFans.shop & item link \-->
<p style= Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.