I hope this doesn't mark the beginning of A&M being lumped in with other SEC "cow colleges". A&M may be a lot of things, but it ain't the barn.Little brother cow colleges have to stick together.
Fair enough, but Manziel is your offense. You lose him, you struggle like Mizzou in the SEC.Obviously you haven't seen our joke of a schedule.
Yes, as in obtained in a legal manner with proper authenticity and reliability. Not hearsay ESPN articles. Any competent multi-million dollar football program should demand this in making their decisions, no?Legal evidence?
When there's been this much smoke, the University of Alabama has acted proactively in the past - one player isn't worth losing an entire season over.Yes, as in obtained in a legal manner with proper authenticity and reliability. Not hearsay ESPN articles. Any competent multi-million dollar football program should demand this in making their decisions, no?
I'm guessing you aren't familiar with the Albert Means case...Yes, as in obtained in a legal manner with proper authenticity and reliability. Not hearsay ESPN articles. Any competent multi-million dollar football program should demand this in making their decisions, no?
If you think the NCAA acts in an even-handed manner with consistent enforcement toward programs, above-board dealings with burden of proof and keeps within its own rules... to borrow a line from Game of Thrones... you haven't been paying attention.Yes, as in obtained in a legal manner with proper authenticity and reliability. Not hearsay ESPN articles. Any competent multi-million dollar football program should demand this in making their decisions, no?
Do you mean in hearsay autograph-signing allegations, or in some other types of cases? I am positive that facts are gathered in making decisions and that newspaper reports or Internet reports aren't taken at face value before making such important decisions. Facts drive decisions for all programs, not "smoke."When there's been this much smoke, the University of Alabama has acted proactively in the past - one player isn't worth losing an entire season over.
I agree that we lack proof at this point, but only fools and aTm fans believe that Manziel is innocent in this. Too many people telling very similar stories about separate instances. Occam's Razor.Do you mean in hearsay autograph-signing allegations, or in some other types of cases? I am positive that facts are gathered in making decisions and that newspaper reports or Internet reports aren't taken at face value before making such important decisions. Facts drive decisions for all programs, not "smoke."
We had our own brush with this type of thing and compliance vetted it carefully, then reported the findings to the SEC. Luckily, this happened in the off-season for us, as otherwise several players likely would have sat until compliance approved their playing.Do you mean in hearsay autograph-signing allegations, or in some other types of cases? I am positive that facts are gathered in making decisions and that newspaper reports or Internet reports aren't taken at face value before making such important decisions. Facts drive decisions for all programs, not "smoke."
I think I saw that car in front of McFarland mallThe moral of the story?Never trust an autograph broker looking to score new rims for his sled.
Does the rest of the Aggie fan base share your thoughts? If so, you're a naive group.We don't even have proof of its existence right now. All we have is ESPN...and they do not bat 1.00 in the truth department. A guilty Johnny Manziel should sit. But no one, anywhere, in any type of responsible athletic department should cut him based off of ESPN articles. That decision is made off of authentic legal evidence. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I've just not seen that come to light yet. I've seen one pic of Manziel in a hotel room and Joe Schadd stories about videos that may or may not exist.
Have you paid any attention to NCAA investigations? Who did the investigative work against USC? UNC? Miami? Ohio State? Auburn? Oregon?Anyone who's ever had a newspaper report done on an event that they personally know a lot about will tell you that the media gets things wrong. It is not being naive to ask for the NCAA to present their evidence, and not cut Manziel based on Joe Schadd. He and Darren Ravell have blown stories before, and will do it again.
Manziel will be suspended or not based on evidence, not Internet articles. That's real world decision making.