I didn't see the article posted anywhere online so I can't judge the content, but I don't like the cover boy
There are college football players who need and maybe deserve a little more than just tuition, books, housing, and meals. Whatever the article says, they could've picked a better example than a spoiled rich kid to put on the cover. Kenny Bell maybe?Nobody is making them accept the paid in full scholarship to the college. Don't play football and seek another type of grant or scholarship. You can get a loan and work your way through college if that's what you would want to do...........
If they want to pay college athletes that's fine, but they should no longer have amateur status. They will be Professionals playing in the minor leagues.I didn't see the article posted anywhere online so I can't judge the content, but I don't like the cover boy
That might be the case, don't you imagine that whatever the amount you give to the one student athlete that is the star QB for said university, that same amount would have to be given the bench warmer on the girls volleyball team, or kid riding the end of bench on any other sport.There are college football players who need and maybe deserve a little more than just tuition, books, housing, and meals. Whatever the article says, they could've picked a better example than a spoiled rich kid to put on the cover. Kenny Bell maybe?
Those top athletes don't get to be top athletes by themselves. If they do, then just put Johnny Football, Johnny Cash, Johnny Autograph, Johnny Paycheck, and all the other Johnnys out there to run, pass, catch, etc. without someone blocking for them!I think it's a legitimate discussion to have, but I don't understand why Manziel is the catalyst for that discussion. Yes, he's well known, but he blatantly broke NCAA violations because he's a selfish *#$@, not because he needed the money. He should noe be the poster child of why NCAA athletes should be paid.
I think you can make a good argument for allowing top players to receive some of the benefits from their celebrity, but I don't see how just straight up paying players is feasible.
I've started reading a book "Saturday Millionaires" by Kristi Dosh which points out horrendous problems that could arise if college athletes get paid, especially going beyond the scholarships covering the full cost of attendance. (And very few schools can do even that.) It would have to include all sports to comply with Title IX, but it also could create problems with tax-exempt status, create taxable income of student athletes and potentially create a situation where they could engage in collective bargaining as in pro sports (which this would be).Who's going to provide the money to pay UAB's women's lacrosse team? (no idea if they have a women's lacrosse team, but....)
Alabama, Texas, USC, and the like probably bring in enough football money that if they WANTED TO, they could pay all of their athletes a small stipend. Not all schools draw enough money from football to even cover their football players, much less those others. And if the money isn't getting provided by the football program, where on earth will it come from, because I'd venture to guess that the vast majority of college sports do not even break even.
Wow, if I had received free tuition, free textbooks, free housing, and meals (all the food that's nourishing) when I was in college, I would have believed that I had died and gone to Heaven.There are college football players who need and maybe deserve a little more than just tuition, books, housing, and meals. Whatever the article says, they could've picked a better example than a spoiled rich kid to put on the cover. Kenny Bell maybe?