I've seen one Heisman watch list that didn't even include McCarron in the top ten, yet it listed Braxton Miller. A lot of sportswriters use the "talent around him" excuse to discount McCarron, but hasn't the performance of Guiton at THE OSU shown that the same thing should probably be said about Miller? How about Tajh Boyd? He's surrounded by major talent also.
I think that all Heisman candidates at major programs have plenty of talent around them. If these sportswriters are going to use that excuse against McCarron, why don't they also consider that he is getting his numbers in a system that isn't designed to allow QBs to build up gaudy statistics? Isn't it just as fair to say that the "system" that many of these QBs play within basically guarantees them higher numbers of pass attempts, which in turn almost guarantees them higher numbers of completions, yards, and TDs. It also probably guarantees higher numbers of INTs, but there are quarterback ratings metrics that are designed to take all these things into account to give a somewhat fair basis of comparison between QBs in different systems.
In yesterday's game, McCarron had a pass efficiency rating of 211 (147 NFL rating), which was higher than Manziel's rating of 204 (130 NFL rating). Yet for some reason, all these sportswriters continue to say that Manziel's performance was better. I suppose that the NCAA's and NFL's quarterback metrics must be wrong since Manziel's performance was so much better.
I wonder if some sportswriters allow their Alabama fatigue or their dislike of Saban to influence their opinion of AJ? It just seems that many sportswriters purposely discount him even though his performances are superior to others that garner a lot of Heisman attention and much more effective than almost all of them.