Re: There's gonna be a lot of surprised LSU fans comes November 9th.
I don't meant to take sides.
And what if that is not the identity of this team but this team wins a national championship?
We're nowhere near that level. A few teams have looked better than us so far. Not saying they are better than us, but they've certainly looked better than us. If we want to win the NC, we will probably need to assume that identity. Like pretty much every NC team in the last 15 years.
Alabama has one of the best QBs in the nation and one of - if not the - best WR groups. Why can this team not pass more than some would like because that's what Coach Bryant and Stallings did?
Because passing teams always come up short. All it takes is for the QB to have one bad game, throw up 3 INTs, and we lose. Or, one CB having a marvelous day and shutting down our receivers. In the college game, you win by having huge OLines bust up paths for your runningbacks.
This team is good enough to win the NC. Whether they do or not will probably be determined by factors other than coaching and talent.
Here's the thing. Is Alabama, as you've seen them so far this season, good enough to beat LSU?
Are we good enough to beat Georgia? South Carolina? Florida? Again, I don't know why anyone would say we are not. Any of those teams could beat us, yes, but we could beat them just as well. Without luck.
Do we need to improve? Of course. Last year's team was in need of improvement all throughout the season. It wasn't a perfect team. Ditto for 2011. This year is no different. The only "luck" we need is injury luck. Other than that, we're more than good enough, and that's about all any fan can ask for. JMO, though.
Every year, there've been 5 or so teams who are "good enough to win the NC". The biggest difference between us and them is that we ran the ball. Same for Tebow's UF teams. This team as we have right now cannot run. I have no problem with what you said (I completely agree), but, to be honest, I haven't seen the domination yet from this team.
And IDK, our 2011 team was far and away the best team that year. I would even say it was a top 5 team ever. Best ever if we had a WR. It was pretty much perfect. Only knock on it was field goal kicking.
There is no new way under the sun to win the NC. You win by scoring more points than the other team, whether you do it by running, passing, or even special teams. You win, by whatever means necessary. That's all Alabama needs to do. Figure out how to win each game. A tall order, yes, but it can be done without the bruising impose your will on the defense running game.
What team has done it like that recently? I'm not contradicting you, but I seriously want to know. In my memory, running games have equaled success (Alabama, LSU, Stanford). While passing games have not (OKST, USC, Oregon, etc).
Championships are won in the NFL all the time on the strength of passing games. The real differentiator is the defense. If your defense keeps improving, your offense will be more than adequate to win every game that you play.
I agree with half of this. They're won in the NFL because NFL linemen are evenly matched. This isn't hte case in college. More often than not, 5 or fewer teams have 95% of the elite linemen in the country.
Also, in the NFL, your WR is going 1v1 or 1v2 in open space versus 1v5+ in the running game.
Not to mention that NFL QBs are able to throw balls perfectly.
College is about exploiting mismatches in the running game. There are only 2-3 teams on the schedule that have the ability to match you in the trenches. You pass against them to open up the trenches (TD to Amari last year against GA.). And then you start pounding again. That's why people like Norwood and Amari and Julio have big games against those kinds of teams. They think we are running because that's what we've done in every other game up til now. And then we torch them and force them to be honest. And then we run again...