It was posted on twitter so I guess TIFWIW.where did you come up with that?
I am sorry but no team that lost to Louisiana Tech should ever make a playoff (Us in 99?)
It was posted on twitter so I guess TIFWIW.where did you come up with that?
I am sorry but no team that lost to Louisiana Tech should ever make a playoff (Us in 99?)
We have no idea what teams the committee would have picked. So.....
That's assuming though that they actually select the top 4 teams each year, and that also assumes that they will allow two teams from one conference in. We'll have to see if that transpires, but if they were going to base the teams simply based off of rankings I don't think they would need a committee of 15 people to do it. If that were the case you can keep the rankings as is and just expand the games. Mark it down, there will be more human control in the matter than in previous years.This is who would have been in the playoffs over the years. Wonder how we would have fared last year and in 2008?
Those rankings are the Top 4 in the Final regular season BCS rankings and the image is 100% correct using those rankings. If the committee had been in existence those years, I suspect the image would be 100% incorrect.I thought the posted image was interesting and, while no one can say it's exactly 100% correct, I think it's safe to assume that it's 75%+ correct. Those actually look like a bunch of great match ups to me and I'm excited to see how it shakes out this year.
This is not a plus one.It is what it is. Nothing but a plus one which is what I wanted the whole time!
Sent from my iPhone
Roll Tide! 15 Time National Champions, More BCS Championships than any school...
The SEC Championship Game could be a minus one.This is not a plus one.
Yeah something like that worries me. Say fsu loses to a bad acc team mid season but we lose to a 1 loss georgia team in Atlanta and you have an undefeated Michigan state and Oregon with fsu taking the Acc who gets in between us and fsu with us having the only legit losswhere did you come up with that?
I am sorry but no team that lost to Louisiana Tech should ever make a playoff (Us in 99?)
They were 8-3 and got some Top 25 votes.where did you come up with that?
I am sorry but no team that lost to Louisiana Tech should ever make a playoff (Us in 99?)
I realize you're speaking theoretically but that can't possibly happen this year since Mich St and Oregon play each other.Yeah something like that worries me. Say fsu loses to a bad acc team mid season but we lose to a 1 loss georgia team in Atlanta and you have an undefeated Michigan state and Oregon with fsu taking the Acc who gets in between us and fsu with us having the only legit loss
No, it's a "plus two, but we're not sure which two."This is not a plus one.
100% incorrect? Nothing would be right?Those rankings are the Top 4 in the Final regular season BCS rankings and the image is 100% correct using those rankings. If the committee had been in existence those years, I suspect the image would be 100% incorrect.
They are:I dont know who are all the committee members. But I think I can honestly say that Tom Osborne and Archie Manning will regret ever getting involved with this. This has a real opportunity of blowing up in their faces.
It would take only one of the four in each year to be different to make the image 100% incorrect. The only way any year would be correct would be if all 4 are conference champions. I did not look at it that closely.100% incorrect? Nothing would be right?
Yeah forgot about that, but it's one thing that worries me.I realize you're speaking theoretically but that can't possibly happen this year since Mich St and Oregon play each other.
How is it not?This is not a plus one.
I think AntiAgentOrange's point when he said 75+% was that three of the four teams each year would still make it in the committee era - not that three out of four years, the committee would have agreed with the top 4 in the BCS.It would take only one of the four in each year to be different to make the image 100% incorrect. The only way any year would be correct would be if all 4 are conference champions. I did not look at it that closely.