This should be interesting to follow during the down time...
http://espn.go.com/college-football...ue-florida-state-seminoles-quarterback-police
http://espn.go.com/college-football...ue-florida-state-seminoles-quarterback-police
This should make a nice light for his trophies. The Heisman will regret this kid.This should be interesting to follow during the down time...
http://espn.go.com/college-football...ue-florida-state-seminoles-quarterback-police
The decision not to charge Jameis Winston didn't teach us anything about the Florida State QB's guilt or innocence, but it did hammer home an old lesson: The system is stacked against sexual assault victims.
Last month, after prosecutors giggled their way through a press conference, former public defender Julie DiCaro revisited her own rape and used the Winston case to explain why so many women fear to come forward.
http://deadspin.com/why-i-believe-jameis-winstons-accuser-1479782169/1495866463/@barryap
All very true.Against FSU, it's going to run into the old "sovereign immunity" problem and maybe against the TPD also. I'm not familiar with FL law on that, but I think it would be about the same as in the other common law states - the sovereign can only be sued to the extent he (it) permits. However, with someone like JW, if she can get a judgment, she can "book" it and it'll follow him until he can pay it - unless he bankrupts out from under it, which is probable...
I am not a lawyer, and I haven't stayed in a Holiday Inn Express in years, but having seen this process occur while a student at the University of Alabama, I think that the State's Attorney should definitely have turned this over to a grand jury. I listened to some sleazebag defense attorney on sports radio here in Atlanta when the whole mess was boiling over, and he tried to float the argument that grand juries indict every case that that see. However, I saw exactly the opposite occur as a student. When the grand jury saw the complete lack of evidence (the rape kit not only did not show rape, but did not even confirm that sexual activity had occurred), they threw the case out. Later, I worked with a girl who was in the same sorority as the accuser, and she told me that the girl was simply looking for an excuse for failing out of school (two semesters of 0.0). Mind you, this was back when we only had 11 national championships, so social media did not exist, and the young man who was being accused was just a student.Hopefully, justice will be served...one way or the other. To the well-informed out there...should the SA have turned it over to the Grand Jury for disposition?
That would have been my move if I were their DA and a FSU Grad.Hopefully, justice will be served...one way or the other. To the well-informed out there...should the SA have turned it over to the Grand Jury for disposition?
You said and I agree.So basically, even though people are ready to call JW a scumbag and a rapist, all we really know is two people and two other witnesses claim that sex did occur.
3 of them (including JW) say it all was (or seemed) consensual to them, after a normal night out by college kids. We can assume that some alcohol or other mood altering substance may have been involved, but I'm not sure of that.
1 of them (the alleged victim) says it was not consensual. And that person also was allegedly shown to have the DNA from 2 men on her clothing (1 being her boyfriend??).
If JW is guilty, he should be required to be locked away for whatever time he is supposed to be locked away for the crime.
However, if he's not guilty, the alleged victim should be punished in some substantial fashion for ruining JW's name.
I wasn't there, as were none of you, so we don't really know what occurred. But almost as horrible as someone raping someone else, is raping someone's reputation with a false accusation. Hopefully a fair trial will be had if legal evidence warrants it.
That's it for my comments on it.