Auburn 2013 National Champions

Mamacalled · Apr 16, 2014

With the N.Y. Times story about Jameis Winston, I have seen several auburn fans claiming the 2013 National Championship. Anyone else experience this?

jthomas666 · Apr 16, 2014

Mamacalled said:
With the N.Y. Times story about Jameis Winston, I have seen several auburn fans claiming the 2013 National Championship. Anyone else experience this?

I'm guessing it's the same people who want to claim the 2003 BCS title. Anyway, it's not an official championship until something gets covered in TP.

BamaFanatJSU · Apr 16, 2014

Mamacalled said:
With the N.Y. Times story about Jameis Winston, I have seen several auburn fans claiming the 2013 National Championship. Anyone else experience this?

That's mind-blowingly awesome logic. The guy was accused of a crime but was never even prosecuted, much less convicted by a jury of his peers (even if he was guilty). The boogs frequently talked about the need for proof when we talked about AJ and the Heisman, but now that he has quarterbacked the team that cost them a championship, he is a felon and should be ineligible, thereby awarding them the MNC by default. You just can't make this stuff up.

selmaborntidefan · Apr 16, 2014

Mamacalled said:
With the N.Y. Times story about Jameis Winston, I have seen several auburn fans claiming the 2013 National Championship. Anyone else experience this?

Well, they claim the 2004 title should be theirs because USC was stripped of the BCS title and they were number two.

They're real bad about claiming stuff that ain't theirs. Funny thing is they accuse us of that but then they try to pretend none of those titles are real. The ONLY reason for this level of fear is because they ARE real. And Auburn will always be little brother, even if they become the first team to ever three-eat. The axis of power will always be in Tuscaloosa and they know it - and it drives them insane.

selmaborntidefan · Apr 16, 2014

Mamacalled said:
With the N.Y. Times story about Jameis Winston, I have seen several auburn fans claiming the 2013 National Championship. Anyone else experience this?

Have you got a link with this behavior on it?

Mamacalled · Apr 16, 2014

selmaborntidefan said:
Have you got a link with this behavior on it?

Several aubie friends on Facebook have posted the link to the article and lead their post with Auburn 2013 National Champions. Here is one that I have a simple reply to
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10201669926765762&id=1107324414&comment_id=5557697&offset=0&total_comments=2&ref=m_notif&notif_t=share_reply&actorid=585085748

selmaborntidefan · Apr 16, 2014

Mamacalled said:
Several aubie friends on Facebook have posted the link to the article and lead their post with Auburn 2013 National Champions. Here is one that I have a simple reply to
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10201669926765762&id=1107324414&comment_id=5557697&offset=0&total_comments=2&ref=m_notif¬if_t=share_reply&actorid=585085748

Thx - guess they shut it down

jthomas666 · Apr 16, 2014

Mamacalled said:
With the N.Y. Times story about Jameis Winston, I have seen several auburn fans claiming the 2013 National Championship. Anyone else experience this?

The responses write themselves...

"You guys sure are quick to claim things that you couldn't win on the field."
"Tell me more about this Heisman-winning QB who should have been ruled ineligible...did his dad pimp him out, too?"

etc.

dadleyblane5 · Apr 16, 2014

My my, those poor poor Boogs.....

BamaMoon · Apr 16, 2014

For crying out loud, how do you lose a game and somehow become the winner? Even if the BCS, which is now defunct, somehow decided to revoke the FSU NC it would be like 2004 and there would be no BCSNC.

selmaborntidefan · Apr 16, 2014

BamaMoon said:
For crying out loud, how do you lose a game and somehow become the winner? Even if the BCS, which is now defunct, somehow decided to revoke the FSU NC it would be like 2004 and there would be no BCSNC.

Maybe we can get someone infected with Barner logic to explain to us how a disqualification of Winston "undoes" the loss of Auburn in 2013 but does NOT undo the loss of Oklahoma in 2004. Those twerps have tried to claim that one as well - because, they told us, it didn't matter because OU now had a loss.

Why do they count OU's loss in 2004 but omit their own in 2013? Answer: because it's genetic, part of being a Barner. This was recently on the SAT:

Logic is to Barner as

The correct answer was kryptonite to Superman.

Mamacalled · Apr 16, 2014

Saw another post staying that Jameis should be disqualified and it should be retroactive. That would mean that FSU played with an ineligible player which then FSU would have to forfeit the game making auburn the winner.

selmaborntidefan · Apr 16, 2014

Mamacalled said:
Saw another post staying that Jameis should be disqualified and it should be retroactive. That would mean that FSU played with an ineligible player which then FSU would have to forfeit the game making auburn the winner.

I say again - using that logic, Oklahoma and NOT AUBURN (who claimed it) is the 2004 champion since Bush was ineligible.

They cannot have this thing both ways. Besides - how does this make him ineligible? (Keep in mind that some of their fans on ITAT accused US of setting Winston up so that when we played them he would not be on the team).

CoastGhost · Apr 16, 2014

Is this another "Books that will never be written" thread?

CrimsonTheory · Apr 17, 2014

According to Booger eater logic, does that mean we can retroactive claim the 2010 Nat'l Title, since they too had an unofficial "ineligible" quarterback playing for them?

Booger fans are so silly.

TideMan09 · Apr 17, 2014

I think it's pretty ironic when they question all our legit NC's we claim, which in actuality, the NCAA claims, we've won more than what we claim by the way all you Barners, yet they turn around & claim a bogus NC & think it's ok for them to claim those..Silly BarnersLOL

B1GTide · Apr 17, 2014

I have no problem with their 2004 claim. They were undefeated and never got to play for it on the field. They lost this game on the field. It doesn't matter who played, they lost, and it was not their only loss on the season.

NoNC4Tubs · Apr 17, 2014

Mamacalled said:
With the N.Y. Times story about Jameis Winston, I have seen several auburn fans claiming the 2013 National Championship. Anyone else experience this?

Using that reasoning, shouldn't Oregon be the 2010 Champs? :cool2:

BamaJama17 · Apr 17, 2014

B1GTide said:
I have no problem with their 2004 claim. They were undefeated and never got to play for it on the field. They lost this game on the field. It doesn't matter who played, they lost, and it was not their only loss on the season.

How can you claim something you didn't win let alone play for?? The barn started lower in the polls the USC and OU and they also lost to USC in 2002 and 2003. They have nobody to blame but themselves for what happened in 2004.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NoNC4Tubs · Apr 17, 2014

selmaborntidefan said:
Maybe we can get someone infected with Barner logic to explain to us how a disqualification of Winston "undoes" the loss of Auburn in 2013 but does NOT undo the loss of Oklahoma in 2004. Those twerps have tried to claim that one as well - because, they told us, it didn't matter because OU now had a loss.

Excellent point!!

Auburn 2013 National Champions

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

1st Team

TideFans Legend

TideFans Legend

Hall of Fame

TideFans Legend

Hall of Fame

All-SEC

Hall of Fame

TideFans Legend

Hall of Fame

TideFans Legend

Suspended

All-American

Hall of Fame

TideFans Legend

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

TideFans.shop - NEW Stuff!