I was hoping for it to be near ESPN channels as well, but my theory is they placed it smack dab next to Big10N to drive an increase in viewership for that network. Just my $0.02.
Like yesterday! on TideFans.comNo time flat? DirecTV just announced the deal a few days ago, I wouldn't call that "no time flat." U-Verse is the only one that did that IMO, since they were the only provider signed up and ready to go on the same day the network was officially announced almost a year ago. There are still 9 days left before the launch, I wouldn't worry about it. If Charter doesn't sign on then they will probably loose at least half there customers in Alabama alone.
What I meant by that was all of the other providers did their deals so much different than Charter has done. Did Direct TV put out some kind of announcement saying that they were "working on a deal" and then announce that they had a deal finalized a few days later? No. In fact, all you heard was, "Direct Tv to carry SEC Network" and that was it. Charter, on the other hand, puts out some kind of misleading headline about a deal being finalized, then, as of today, officials at the SEC Network say that they know of no such deal being worked on. Very strange. This makes Charter look suspect and it looks as if they won't be carrying it, even at the risk of losing a lot of business.No time flat? DirecTV just announced the deal a few days ago, I wouldn't call that "no time flat." U-Verse is the only one that did that IMO, since they were the only provider signed up and ready to go on the same day the network was officially announced almost a year ago. There are still 9 days left before the launch, I wouldn't worry about it. If Charter doesn't sign on then they will probably loose at least half there customers in Alabama alone.
Charter making me DT_mad3:The last thing we heard was they were "finalizing" a deal. How long does it take? Geez.
DirecTV has been saying for months that they were in negotiation. Just last week the head of DirecTV said they were "close" to finalizing a deal. With all due respect, you have this one completely wrong. I kept up with it because I am a DirecTV subscriber. I can't blame you for not knowing since you seem to have Charter.What I meant by that was all of the other providers did their deals so much different than Charter has done. Did Direct TV put out some kind of announcement saying that they were "working on a deal" and then announce that they had a deal finalized a few days later? No. In fact, all you heard was, "Direct Tv to carry SEC Network" and that was it. Charter, on the other hand, puts out some kind of misleading headline about a deal being finalized, then, as of today, officials at the SEC Network say that they know of no such deal being worked on. Very strange. This makes Charter look suspect and it looks as if they won't be carrying it, even at the risk of losing a lot of business.
This is correct about Directv. I'd been watching it closely too.DirecTV has been saying for months that they were in negotiation. Just last week the head of DirecTV said they were "close" to finalizing a deal. With all due respect, you have this one completely wrong. I kept up with it because I am a DirecTV subscriber. I can't blame you for not knowing since you seem to have Charter.
You and me both!This is correct about Directv. I'd been watching it closely too.
Don't know what/how Charter has done it.
But the biggest loser yesterday was Dish. They were salivating at millions of Directv customers they probably thought would come their way had Directv not signed on.
I wasn't planning on changing...too big of a hassle...so I'm glad directv got r done!
Awesome news! I have the Ultimate package so hopefully I'm good.
I hereby take back all the bad things I said about Charter!