I'm not pleased if this is true because less competition is bad for the consumer. I would imagine Verizon feels even stronger about it.
Cable and satellite compete, so I can't see where you get that...besidesI'm not pleased if this is true because less competition is bad for the consumer. I would imagine Verizon feels even stronger about it.
That would allow U-Verse to expand and compete better, they have only 6 million customers.The deal would also, and perhaps more importantly for AT&T, provide the company access to DirecTV’s cash war chest, reported at $2.6 billion in free cash flow last year. That could fund new initiatives, or new acquisitions, for AT&T.
Maybe it's not obvious to some AT&T is slowly but surely getting its monopoly back together.Cable and satellite compete, so I can't see where you get that...besides
That would allow U-Verse to expand and compete better, they have only 6 million customers.
Verizon says hi.Maybe it's not obvious to some AT&T is slowly but surely getting its monopoly back together.
Verizon will take a hit because currently you can bundle with Directv.
Right , but my point is that AT&T will never again be a monopoly.Verizon will take a hit because currently you can bundle with Directv.
I hope you're right.Right , but my point is that AT&T will never again be a monopoly.
Th' gubment won't 'llow it.Right , but my point is that AT&T will never again be a monopoly.
So it was OK with you when ATT had to start sharing their lines with every TOM, DICK & HARRY?Maybe it's not obvious to some AT&T is slowly but surely getting its monopoly back together.
Do you think AT&T paid for those lines? Their customers did. I take it you didn't think breaking up Ma Belle was good for the consumer.So it was OK with you when ATT had to start sharing their lines with every TOM, DICK & HARRY?
Just curious.
I believe in a free market without gbmnt interference. The customers paid for a service and the lines belonged to ATT, the MABELLS now. ToDo you think AT&T paid for those lines? Their customers did. I take it you didn't think breaking up Ma Belle was good for the consumer.
That is not what we had when AT&T was the only game in town.I believe in a free market without gbmnt interference.
I have an iPhone and my wife has a Samsung Galaxy S3. We don't have any issues with a delay in messages. I will be keeping my eyes open for this class action suit.Yeah. Simple fact is we don't like a lot of the regulations we have but most of then came into being because of exploitation between groups.
I heard yesterday that a class action has been filed against Apple because they are slower at sending text messages to Android phones. My wife, my sister and I tested it yesterday while not scientific text messages to my Galaxy phone were about 8 minutes slower coming from an iPhone.
May not seem like a big deal at first but 8 minutes is a long time if you are in distress.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
The class action lawsuit is not about Apple being slow to send text to Android phones, it's about a bug in Apple's iMessage system (there iOS to iOS device messaging alternative) for folks that switch from an iPhone to another device, like Android or Windows Phone. The issue is that for many user who were using iMessage and switch to a none Apple device, they no longer receive text messages from people who still have an iPhone. This is because Apple's iMessage system has not released there phone number so it is still trying to deliver the texts as iMessages instead of sending them as normal text messages. Since iMessages only work between Apple devices, those messages are just lost and never delivered.Yeah. Simple fact is we don't like a lot of the regulations we have but most of then came into being because of exploitation between groups.
I heard yesterday that a class action has been filed against Apple because they are slower at sending text messages to Android phones. My wife, my sister and I tested it yesterday while not scientific text messages to my Galaxy phone were about 8 minutes slower coming from an iPhone.
May not seem like a big deal at first but 8 minutes is a long time if you are in distress.
The SEC managed to retain copyrights on games dating back to the 1960s when it signed 15-year deals with CBS and ESPN in 2008.
The SEC will also launch a re-tooled website July 1, which will be powered by ESPN.
"We're going to take a lot of the best pieces of the ESPN.com site and you'll see some similarities with our conference website," Hussey said.
T
Re: Latest Bama News 5/22/14