We don't have a rule forbidding criticism of players, per se - just harsh and improper criticism. Your post doesn't violate that, and FWIW, I agree...Earle, since these are pros (11 of 'em from the Premiership alone for Belgium!), hope it's permitted to critique the US without getting whacked. And have to think Mr Bradley in the midfield played up to his lookalike, Casper the Friendly Ghost, throughout the tournament with a disappearing act for the ages. Otherwise, US exceeded every expectation and very much belonged in being there.
Correction: There's always the next quadrennial...four years away in Mother Russia.There's always next year!
Good point. Only a few of the players play at the highest international level, although I think Howard will be returning to MU after this...Proud of this team - they had a chance just before time expired to win this. Just wasn't their day to win it, but they left it on the field and looked decent enough in doing so.
I'll say this - the US team as a whole lacks the footwork and ball control that the better teams in the World Cup have - in every game I saw many bad passes, consistent bad timing, etc. We probably just don't have the foundation in place as a country to have premier players across the board on a team.