Gives them the right to carry or drop whatever products they wish and for whatever reason. Doesn't absolve them from consequences.Aren't they a private company?
i will wager that they wont face any real consequences for this. i seriously doubt re-tweeted outrage is going to go very deepGives them the right to carry or drop whatever products they wish and for whatever reason. Doesn't absolve them from consequences.
I agree.i will wager that they wont face any real consequences for this. i seriously doubt re-tweeted outrage is going to go very deep
You are probably right, but I will never underestimate the ability of Americans to become outraged.i will wager that they wont face any real consequences for this. i seriously doubt re-tweeted outrage is going to go very deep
yes, but it is a fleeting high with the dragon staying just out of reachYou are probably right, but I will never underestimate the ability of Americans to become outraged.
LOL! The violation of the 1st Amendment would occur if they were forced to carry it...This is a form of censorship. They will not get any more of my money!
This should be a violation of the 1st Amendment. However, I guess we don't have a constitution any more, just executive orders!
Reminds me of a movie about The Truth! It's like they are protecting us from The Truth! "You can't handle the Truth." Well, I want to know the Truth and in reading Dinesh D'Souza's America: …., I think I found the Truth about this administration and the Progressive movement. The book just confirmed my beliefs. Seems like Dinesh D'Souza is one of the few Americans who does understand the Truth about all the lies and deception currently occurring. Americans, wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Give me Liberty or give me Death. Looks like it's going to be the latter.
Reb you need to join again ,then quit , for you to be a protest.Meh. I haven't shopped at Costco for almost 10 years now. I don't remember exactly why I stopped, but it's good to know I was right in doing so.
Have you read the 1A? I'll post it here, for ease:This should be a violation of the 1st Amendment. However, I guess we don't have a constitution any more, just executive orders!
Please tell me how this violates 1A in any shape, form, or fashion.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.