Well, he's always been an option and he can certainly do it."RB’s- It sounds like the staff would rather just play with Yeldon and Henry. Even though Drake got the publicity, both Tenpenny and Jones have been in the doghouse this summer as well. While it will have to play out this fall, The term “FB” and Fowler is being pushed by Kiffin. You get the sense that Drake is on his 9th live with the staff."
So Fowler could be " 3rd" options? This should be interesting.
so it is not just me?Hmmm....
Not sure what I think of this "Intel".
Some of our backup RBs may have more issues than we've heard about, but I can't imagine the staff would "rather" play without them.
And Kirby "can't hold a candle" to Cristobal (the author can't even spell MC's name correctly)? What does that even mean? The offensive line was hardly technically stellar last season.
Too much of this article just leaves me shaking my head.
The Intel on the site has been pretty good lately. There was a thread on that website few weeks ago... someone brought that in and I ve found lot of information to be consistent with what I was hearing but that's just me.Hmmm....
Not sure what I think of this "Intel".
Some of our backup RBs may have more issues than we've heard about, but I can't imagine the staff would "rather" play without them.
And Kirby "can't hold a candle" to Cristobal (the author can't even spell MC's name correctly)? What does that even mean? The offensive line was hardly technically stellar last season.
Too much of this article just leaves me shaking my head.
I'll have to talk to Earle about this and see what he says. If he says it's no go I'll ask him to delete thisso it is not just me?
Not to imply I agree with the article in any way, but I think the author is suggesting that MC has the 'it' factor to be a fantastic HC, which is hardly news to most anyone who has watched CFB over the last few years. He's gonna be a superstar HC some day.And Kirby "can't hold a candle" to Cristobal (the author can't even spell MC's name correctly)? What does that even mean? The offensive line was hardly technically stellar last season.
Maybe so. Right now I'm just hoping he can get the Oline playing up to par.Not to imply I agree with the article in any way, but I think the author is suggesting that MC has the 'it' factor to be a fantastic HC, which is hardly news to most anyone who has watched CFB over the last few years. He's gonna be a superstar HC some day.
Maybe so. Right now I'm just hoping he can get the Oline playing up to par.
For all we know, he did an outstanding job here with a rebuilt offensive line that lost three All-Americans from the year before.CMC did an outstanding job at FIU. I still do not understand why they fired him, but I'm glad we got him. I think he will be that "Superstar" head coach someday. Of course, it may be at The U.
Possibly, but that would be much simpler to gauge had we seen a marked improvement in the line between the first game and the last.For all we know, he did an outstanding job here with a rebuilt offensive line that lost three All-Americans from the year before.
Bhammer, with all due respect, if you didn't see a difference between the opening game and LSU, we weren't watching the same team. Our offensive line got significantly better throughout the season. Could it be that we were a tad spoiled by what preceded it?Possibly, but that would be much simpler to gauge had we seen a marked improvement in the line between the first game and the last.
Post of the day right here^^^^^Bhammer, with all due respect, if you didn't see a difference between the opening game and LSU, we weren't watching the same team. Our offensive line got significantly better throughout the season. Could it be that we were a tad spoiled by what preceded it?