Re: Micheal Bloomberg on immigration and the economy
The chart shows that 2005-2010 more Mexicans were returning than coming.
First, it does not address net immigration just net Mexican immigration.
Second, what happened 2005-2010 does not really address what is happening now.
You know the line: there are lies, darn lies and statistics.I am ever the contrarian . Here is an article from The Atlantic that supports some of Bloomburg's claims about net migration. Easy read.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/07/americas-emigration-problem/309410/
The conversation about immigration reform centers on all the people who want to come to the U.S. But the flow of migrants in and out of the country has changed markedly over the past decade, as have economic conditions in both the U.S. and its traditional feeder countries—most notably Mexico, the largest source of immigrants by far. Perhaps it’s time to broaden the discussion beyond who’s coming into the U.S., and look at who’s leaving.
Pretty graphs in the link. Data sources are at the end of the article.
I await the ire of my fellows!
The chart shows that 2005-2010 more Mexicans were returning than coming.
First, it does not address net immigration just net Mexican immigration.
Second, what happened 2005-2010 does not really address what is happening now.