Funny how that works isn't it? LOL!I didn't hear him complaining about this last year when he signed his new five year, $15 million contract...
Funny how that works isn't it? LOL!I didn't hear him complaining about this last year when he signed his new five year, $15 million contract...
Another side of this as well--Universities have quite a few rich alumnus who contribute hundreds of thousands or even millions to their respective schools. You'll find most of them at the football stadium on Saturday afternoons.He's right to an extent, but, as has been already pointed out, college football has provided resources to the schools & the athlete's themselves with state of art learning resources, that wouldn't been provide without college football money.."Sold Out" is the wrong term, when I think of "Sold Out" or "Sold Their Souls To The Devil" I think of Auburn in their conquest to get out from underneath the shadow of the best college football program in the history of the game..Alabama..
Your time perspecitve on this ^^ may be off a bit. Pickens' contributions to the OkSt football program were more of a generator of their improvement than a result of their improvement. Their facilities and the abiltiy to pay and retain good coaches {beginning with Les Miles} improved and more wins followed. Not so much the other way around.Another side of this as well--Universities have quite a few rich alumnus who contribute hundreds of thousands or even millions to their respective schools. You'll find most of them at the football stadium on Saturday afternoons.
I have no basis for this statement at all but I'd bet there is a direct correlation between the size of the contributions and the success of the football teams.
I'll use T. Boone Pickens as an example. Oklahoma State starts winning football games, and the next thing you know he's contributing hundreds of millions to his alma mater.
sip
I agree if we limit it to the bigger schools/conferences and to the bigger sports within those schools. Many of these kids have no real interest in the educational aspects, so they can be said not to be true "student" athletes.Let's be honest, while it's become even more obvious in some cases, the idea of the 'student athlete' essentially died DECADES ago...
I think most of these kids take advantage of their opportunity, and it is a huge opportunity to be able to receive a free education for playing a game despite what many would have us believe. There are those superstars who are only interested in doing just enough educationally speaking to stay eligible until they can enter the draft, but we have many true student-athletes in many sports who conduct their affairs appropriately, make great connections, receive their degrees, and have fun while doing so. However, the focus is never on these kids. It's on the squeaky wheels who somehow think they are getting ripped off, or on the athletes who make stupid decisions. I wish they would just let the kids who think they can play pro ball go straight to the pros while the kids who want to get an education and have a great college experience can agree to accept a scholarship in return for work on the playing fields. There you go, people. Once again I have solved a simple problem that many people try to make complicated. Gee, I wonder who tries to make simple problems complicated? I'm guessing those who stand to profit from it, and I'm not talking about the student-athletes.Let's be honest, while it's become even more obvious in some cases, the idea of the 'student athlete' essentially died DECADES ago...
Yah, I didn't mean to imply it was true across the board, but rather make the point that players that otherwise would have little / no chance of going to college have done so for a long time because they were good football players and had a shot at the NFL.Most of these kids still are student athletes in every sense. Not sure how making money would change that. It doesn't for any other kid working his way through school.