lot's of truth in that post
I think you forgot the blue font.
lot's of truth in that post
I agree with the first part- sip's assessment was dead on. UGA and TAMU both played great but it's really hard to tell if that means anything....CLEM and USCe could both end up 8-4 while WV goes 10-2.Best assessment that I've read. Georgia and TAMU look to be the best in the conference to me at this point in time.
nope, sometimes the truth hurts. and other times you only see what you want to seeI think you forgot the blue font.
I said at this point in time.I agree with the first part- sip's assessment was dead on. UGA and TAMU both played great but it's really hard to tell if that means anything....CLEM and USCe could both end up 8-4 while WV goes 10-2.
Nowhere did I say or imply that we've lost 20 games. Not sure where you got that. Why is it that when I complain about certain, specific areas, do certain posters take my dissatisfaction in one area and suggest (sarcastically) I should apply it to every area? You guys need to quit jumping the gun. What I said has merit and in no way contradicts the great things CNS has accomplished at the Capstone. I said I was unhappy with the pressure we've put on some of these "amazing game" QBs, not the overall results of Saban's tenure.We have to have lost like 20 games, based on what I'm reading. Am I right?
My vote is for Todd Gurley.So, if FSU messes around and loses, Who is #1. Bama didn't look like the country's best team. or did they?
Bama has lost seven games since 2009. Here they are:We've played more QB's that are "on fire" over the past five seasons than anyone else. It's time to quit using that excuse. Period. A lot of QBs look good when you give them all day to throw and you've got DBs that don't turn around. Seriously though, we've got to drop that "but such-and-such QB played the game of his life" excuse. Our problems on defense had a lot to do with the plethora of QBs who've played "the game of their life" against us in the past four seasons.
Maybe aTm looked like the #1 team?So, if FSU messes around and loses, Who is #1. Bama didn't look like the country's best team. or did they?
You're ignoring Manziel in 2013 and Trickett this year because we won. Also Mettenberger in 2012. We don't face a lot of great QBs every year. This isn't the NFL. Lately, when we do, however, we let them be way too comfortable. Also, I'm not just referring to the past, but the future. It's a trend that's been building slowly and I believe will become more apparent in the future until it is addressed by the Coach. It's becoming more frequent.Bama has lost seven games since 2009. Here they are:
2010: #19 USC - 17/20, 201, 3 TD, 1 INT
2010: #10 LSU - 14/20, 208, 1 TD, 0 INT
2010: #2 Auburn - 13/20, 216, 3 TD, 0 INT
2011: #2 LSU - 9/17, 91, 0 TD, 2 INT
2012: #15 Texas A&M - 24/31, 253, 2 TD, 0 INT
2013: #4 Auburn - 11/16, 97, 2 TD, 0 INT
2013: #11 Oklahoma - 32/44, 348, 4 TD, 1 INT
Out of those seven games, only two threw for more than 216 yards and only three threw for three or more TDs (only one threw for four). We've averaged allowing 203 ypg passing, 2.1 TDs/g and 0.6 INTs/g - hardly awful stats.
Few of these teams have anything in common stylistically, though you could argue that the 2010 Auburn team is sorta HUNH like the last three losses have been. Otherwise, we face good / great QBs throughout the season and generally make them look pedestrian.
So what exactly is the problem again?
Yes, absolutely.You're ignoring Manziel in 2013 and Trickett this year because we won. Also Mettenberger in 2012.
Show me a defense that's been better than Alabama over the last five years and we'll talk - otherwise you're complaining about how the game is changing without addressing the very fact that it's changing. Offenses and defenses adapt, and ignoring the fact that the rule changes that have allowed HUNH-like teams to have the advantage tells me you're ignoring the facts simply to make a point.We don't face a lot of great QBs every year. This isn't the NFL. Lately, when we do, however, we let them be way too comfortable. Also, I'm not just referring to the past, but the future. It's a trend that's been building slowly and I believe will become more apparent in the future until it is addressed by the Coach. It's becoming more frequent.
Because Trickett had the ball out of his hands within a second of the snap, or Bama had pressure on him. Mallet and Wilson sat back in the pocket, so we could blitz the heck out of them.Remember Arkansas and their stud QBs? We made them wanna quit. I'm not sure why we can't affect guys like Trickett like that.
I complained about it a few times in the game threads - Bama got called for holding on several occasions, but at least one score happened BECAUSE of holding and it was ignored. Likewise, many times during the game pressure was avoided not by great WVU QB play, but by the OL being allowed to drag our players to the ground...Didn't take part in the game threads, so I'm not sure if this was discussed in those. Did anyone notice the WVU DEs holding Bama players (OJ, Nudie, Christion, and others) from going into the flats when Blake would roll out? Blake's checkdown on those plays were taken away by the DE. Have to give him kudos for not getting rattled because of it.
Personally, I think guys not being ready when the ball snaps has a lot to do with that. Regular-tempo offenses have not been a problem for us (mostly). They have time to process the play call, get ready, and fire off the ball.Remember Arkansas and their stud QBs? We made them wanna quit. I'm not sure why we can't affect guys like Trickett like that.
Give me specific examples.We've had more QBs who weren't great before they played us break out and look like NFL-caliber QBs than most other teams. Yes, we have great pass efficiency stats over the years. We pad our passing efficiency stats against cupcakes the same way Oregon pads their total offense against cupcakes.
I'm saying our problems on defense have everything to do with these QBs breaking out against. Lately our defense makes QBs comfortable.