I agree. And before anyone asks yes I whoop my boy with a belt as my Dad did me. But my whooping stay to his butt and not his legs, back, front of his legs and God knows anywhere else that AP hit this child. I seen two pics and that was enough for me and made me sick.
Imagine how bad those wounds were before they had a WEEK to heal. And, there were wounds like those on the scrotum, too. To me, this is more disturbing than the Ray Rice attack. The child is FOUR, for God's sake.
I agree. I wore marks like that before too and my Dad hit pretty dang hard too, but even he had control and hit my rear, Not my privates and the front of my legs. This was BEYOND a whooping. I've had people tell me that is what a switch does, I know what one does and yes it leaves marks and that is not my main gripe. My main gripe is where Peterson hit this kid at, To me that is what makes it abuse. Why would you hit a kids privates and the front of their legs? Makes no sense to me. I can only imagine the pics of the child without the underwear on.....
You need to look. It will change your mind big time. There is a whelp every few inches up and down the legs (front and back) and supposedly on his privates as well.
I strongly agree with that. My daughter would get a little surprise pop and it often worked.
I suspect you're right on that thought. It wouldn't surprise me if Peterson didn't suffer the same consequences as a child at the hands of his own parents (or at least from his father). In some families, punishment of that type was (and is) deemed as "acceptable" and certainly never questioned. What horrible act did this 4 year old child commit to deserve that punishment?
Wow, one pop? I would have pushed that button repeatedly.
I agree about the suspension. The Vikings should have kept him suspended, but because they got their behinds handed to them, they had a change of heart I suppose.
