http://reason.com/blog/2014/09/17/texas-wants-to-execute-man-who-killed-ho
Wow. The man was protecting himself and his property. I wish I was on the jury.
Wow. The man was protecting himself and his property. I wish I was on the jury.
Harsh, but true.I think Mr. Guy's attorney should take a page out of the TideFans playbook and use this as his opening statement:
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Officer Dimwit...uhhhh...Dinwiddie decided to serve a warrant by, wait for it...wait for it...SNEAKING INTO THE DEFENDANT'S HOME THROUGH A WINDOW, COMPLETELY UNANNOUNCED, AT 5:30 IN THE MORNING. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes."
so at 5:30am, when you are dead asleep, you are capable of reaching the front door in ~10secs? if not, then there is no practical difference between just busting the door in immediately.Crazy. Completely insane. Words cannot express the disgust I have for these types of "searches". What happened to the good old method of encircling the house, banging really hard 2-3 times, announcing police loudly, and then busting in the door when no one answers in 5 seconds?
how about the even better old days where you arrest the guy in the street, and then get a warrant to search his house.
All I mean is, even old case law allows a fairly quick entry of police under exigent circumstances. There's no need for the stealth operations like they're hunting for bin Laden. Knocking and announcing alerts the homeowner that it is the police and not a robber (yes, some folks probably have pretended to be police in a break in, but if someone yells they're the Po-Po, they usually are).so at 5:30am, when you are dead asleep, you are capable of reaching the front door in ~10secs? if not, then there is no practical difference between just busting the door in immediately.
how about the even better old days where you arrest the guy in the street, and then get a warrant to search his house.