I would agree that Henry is perhaps the most talented back we have (at least among those who've gotten significant work), but I think at least SOME of the perception of that is a function of our offense and the way it is run.
I've almost always thought our #2 RB always looked best, going back to Coffee/Ingram, Ingram/Richardson, Richardson/Lacy, Lacy/Yeldon, etc. And it at least some of that is due to the way we use them.
The #1 back seems to often get the toughest carries, early in a game/series against fresher defensive legs and sees more stacked boxes when the games scores are tight. The #2 guy gets more work with a more tired/stretched defense and often when opponents get down a little in the score and have to gamble more. Also, the #1 guy is always older and has taken more hits and maybe hesitates a bit more.
I've almost always thought our #2 RB always looked best, going back to Coffee/Ingram, Ingram/Richardson, Richardson/Lacy, Lacy/Yeldon, etc. And it at least some of that is due to the way we use them.
The #1 back seems to often get the toughest carries, early in a game/series against fresher defensive legs and sees more stacked boxes when the games scores are tight. The #2 guy gets more work with a more tired/stretched defense and often when opponents get down a little in the score and have to gamble more. Also, the #1 guy is always older and has taken more hits and maybe hesitates a bit more.