If Michigan were winning, say at a level to contend for the Final Four playoff, the Morris incident would be a minor footnote, garnering little or no notice.
But he isn't winning, and his teams are actually regressing. So they want him gone for lack of performance, not callousness toward his players.
Trouble is, for decades they've annointed themselves the protectors of all that is good and right. Winning the right way. Preferring to lose than win the wrong way. Nobly upholding the Michigan Man ideal in the face of ever-eroding adherence to morals.
Now, they're faced with the reality of losing, with a Michigan Man who, by all accounts runs a clean program, at the helm.
Hmmmmm....latch onto the first thing you can that doesn't have anything directly to do with Ws and Ls, and trumpet it for all it's worth. All the better if you can wrap yourself in the mantle of preserving integrity, rather than soiling yourself with that slimy stuff about "winning" that the hoi polloi worry about. We're SO better than all that.
Hoke's toast, but it's about his record, not Shane Morris.
BTW -- A lot of talking heads speculate that Michigan will go after another Michigan Man, generally without comment on the limitations that places on the search. Where was this tolerance when Alabama fans didn't like Bill Curry? Or when, several years later, they faxed DuBose into the chair? We got pilloried for being provincial and narrow-minded, trying to recapture Bryant.
Given their rejection of Rodriguez and their current preference for an alum, where is their narrow-mindedness? SMH