First, let's put the SEC and SEC West's resume out there. This is highly pertinent because it explains why they deserve greater consideration.
27-1. I believe that's the SEC West's record against other teams, with the only loss coming from the last place SEC West team against the first place SEC East team.
7-3, that's the SEC's bowl record last year. After the Pac-12 (6-3) the Big 12 went 3-3, the ACC went 5-6, and the Big 10 went 2-5. Excluding the head to head matchup,
the SEC is 8-1 in the BCSCG, and this includes victories from 3 different SEC West teams, mind you no other conference has won even 2! This combines to provide compelling evidence that the SEC West in particular is signifigantly ahead of all other conferences. The SEC West has earned the benefit of a doubt!
They and Alabama have very similar stories, IMO. Hard to tell their seasons apart if both end up 11-1.
ND's schedule includes Stanford, FSU (2), ASU (14), Louisville & USC (20).
Alabama's schedule includes WVU, Ole Miss (3), aTm, LSU (24), MSU (1) & Auburn (5).
IMO, your argument should not be against ND getting in ahead of Alabama - it should be against any other one loss team from any other conference getting in ahead of Alabama. Those are the schools with very suspect schedules and really bad losses.
I added the AP rankings, which easily demonstrates the SoS gap (
2, 14, 20, vs. 1, 3, 5?). My argument is not that Notre Dame wouldn't deserve to be in, but that they wouldn't deserve to get in over Alabama. According to Sagarin, Notre Dame is 1-1 against the top 30 with an SoS of 34. Alabama is 3-1 against the top 30 with an SoS of 9 and two top ten opponents upcoming. If you add the committee's criteria to the mix, it weighs even more heavily in Alabama's favor, due to key injuries against Ole Miss. All of this assuming they do just toss out the polls, which also favor Alabama. Notre Dame doesn't currently have a bad resume, they just don't have anything right now to argue they deserve to be ahead of Alabama.
You, Krazy3, of all people, ought to understand all of this. Knowing what you've posted before on this subject, it's baffling to me that you've taken the stance you have in this thread.
I suppose I consider more to be at risk other than just one championship. If they have completely abandoned the polls, even as a guide, if they have completely abandoned attempting to choose a legitimate top four, then all that history, all that tradition, what a championship means, will be go down the drain. I think the playoff is bad, I think the committee is bad, but I hope they still use a tiny bit of logic and follow their own rules, and if they do, Alabama is in if they win out. Mind you, last year I said Alabama was probably out, but this year Alabama's resume if they win out would be much better as would their SoS.
I think what Krazy is saying is that if no one can even make an argument for why Notre Dame is more deserving, then the committee would be committing suicide by selecting them over Alabama. They still have a reputation to uphold if they want to continue.
I think the first rankings that come out will be telling. If Alabama is in the top 4 in this ranking, then the "win out and we're in" crowd will be effectively correct. Because if Alabama is #4 now and they win out, they should be, at worst, #3 at the end of the season and probably #2. If the committee then drops them to #5 just so they don't make the playoff, it would completely invalidate their own rankings from earlier in the year - which means all teams and all fanbases will consider the mid-season rankings meaningless. And that is the about the worst thing the playoff committee can do - convince the public their rankings are meaningless.
I think you pretty much nailed my perspective. The committee doesn't have any credibility to lose. I will add though, that even if they put Alabama 5th, or may be 6th, the committee still might not be able to keep them out if they win out. Once they rank Miss. State and Auburn, they're establishing how good those teams are in their minds. That means they will have to highly value wins over those teams. So, they'll have a very hard time keeping Alabama from moving up in their rankings after a win over one of their top ranked teams.
I did my hand wringing when they decided to ditch the BCS. I like logic, the BCS had logic. I don't like the playoff and I don't like the committee. I would be fine with the idea of Alabama being on the outside looking in of the BCS, because they lost a game and Ole Miss and FSU haven't. But, I also know that they'd still be on the verge and if one trips up they'd get a second chance. But, the idea that they could be #3 and left out of a four team playoff? This nonsense, this smoke filled room nonsense, of course I hate it.