If you predict percentages like Nate Silver usually does, statistically speaking you cant be wrong unless the % is zero or 100.
A lot of people have been more accurate than Nate Silver. No one has been more accurate than him (A) regularly, (B) publicly, and (C) specifically.My prediction was more accurate. Just saying.
Well, he had Kansas as an independent win, not Democrat.If he gotten correctly Kansas and North Carolina -- (which would have both been Dem wins....) then the Republicans would have only picked up 5 -- so where were his other 3?
Louisiana, Alaska -- and where?
want to hear something funny? That built in pesticide, Bacillus thruringiens, is by itself consider a safe organic pesticide by the FDA. Consequently organic farmers use it like water. So if you steer clear of GM foods and only eat organic you are far more likely to be ingesting this particular pesticide. Remember that next time you bite into an organic vegetableAgreed it should be addressed at a national level. I find it interesting that Big Agriculture/Dow are fighting it tooth and nail. It's also interesting that many European countries are banning GMO foods as are China (chuckle) and Japan. Jesus, GMO foods have a built in pesticide, no one in their right mind can tell me that poisoning my body with that crap is good.
None of that is true. He's just been smart enough to market himself. Okay, so I guess that would make B true.A lot of people have been more accurate than Nate Silver. No one has been more accurate than him (A) regularly, (B) publicly, and (C) specifically.
If he predicted the Republicans to lose Kansas -- then it would have been a net +7 -- but I guess the GOP would have picked up 8, but lost one (kansas) if I understand what you typed.....so he predicted a Net +7Well, he had Kansas as an independent win, not Democrat.
He had Iowa, Colorado, Alaska, Louisiana, Arkansas, West Virginia, South Dakota, and Montana as Republican pick ups.