I'd be curious to see if FSU wins out, they'd be ahead of us in the BCS, assuming we win out too. Call me crazy, but an undefeated team in a major conference should be higher than a one loss team. I know we've played tougher opponents than FSU and they've basically played a lot of mediocre teams, but there's something to be said for winning them all.
That aspect worries me a fair bit. The problem is, they can kind of flip that on a team at any given moment. If there were several undefeated teams, then FSU probably should be the lowest ranked of the major conference undefeated teams. I do however, question if one loss teams should jump them.
For one, we don't know what the justification is. Are they giving Alabama and Oregon a mulligan due to the injuries? Or, is it simply because of the SoS (I'd hate for it to be because of injuries)? The other thing, is you have to give the undefeated team a benefit of a doubt. For instance, you have to assume that had FSU played Miss. State or Arizona, that they beat them. That might not be likely, but by not losing FSU earns the right say they
could have won those games
.
I think we can kind of toss out the notion that quality wins are the main factor, since FSU has two quality (top 25) wins, which is actually more than Alabama, and Oregon has 3 quality wins if I counted those correctly. But, FSU actually can finish relatively strong, with Boston College, Florida, and likely Georgia Tech. We'll see what they do in their final rankings, but I'm not sure I like the idea that FSU likely stays behind Oregon.