haha sorry dude. you did have one mistake in there... bama was ranked and undefeated when we beat auburn in 08Dang, you beat me to it. I did all of the hard work for no reason. *tear flowing down my face*
haha sorry dude. you did have one mistake in there... bama was ranked and undefeated when we beat auburn in 08Dang, you beat me to it. I did all of the hard work for no reason. *tear flowing down my face*
haha sorry dude. you did have one mistake in there... bama was ranked and undefeated when we beat auburn in 08
haha sorry dude. you did have one mistake in there... bama was ranked and undefeated when we beat auburn in 08
when Bama is ranked and auburn is not since 1980 their record is 10-1
When auburn is ranked and bama isnt their record is 8-4 since 1980
When both teams are ranked auburn leads the series 10-1 since 1980
When bama is ranked higher and both teams are ranked their record is 1-5 since 1980
When auburn is ranked higher and both teams are ranked their record is 5-0 since 1980.
so overall bama is 11-11 when they're ranked since 1980
auburn is 18-5 when they're ranked
so there are all the stat breakdowns y'all asked for.
I am curious: Why are you using 1980 as your starting point?when Bama is ranked and auburn is not since 1980 their record is 10-1
When auburn is ranked and bama isnt their record is 8-4 since 1980
When both teams are ranked auburn leads the series 10-1 since 1980
When bama is ranked higher and both teams are ranked their record is 1-5 since 1980
When auburn is ranked higher and both teams are ranked their record is 5-0 since 1980.
so overall bama is 11-11 when they're ranked since 1980
auburn is 18-5 when they're ranked
so there are all the stat breakdowns y'all asked for.
79 was the last time we beat them when both teams were ranked in the API am curious: Why are you using 1980 as your starting point?
please tell me im wrong was intended to indicate that I was hoping to be incorrect in my stat finding because its a pretty negative stat."please tell me I'm wrong" would indicate you are concerned.
When we're both ranked and we're ranked higher, we lose 83% of those matchups over the last 30+ years. we're 1-5.Those stats are interesting. Thanks.
The one that matters most to me is when we are ranked higher vs a lower ranked barn. Looks like we win 83% of those contests.
true... but saban is 0-3 against ranked auburn teams at bama.I have it on good authority that neither Bill Curry nor Mike Shula will be on the Bama sideline Saturday.
idk why youre making the attempt to make me look foolish? its not an obscure stat at all. we've lost 10 of the last 11 when both teams are ranked.How do we play during a half-moon?
so, now you're assimilating a game of complete random chance with a game of skill, and attempting to make the point that, since I dont make the same assimilation, I am of inferior intelligence. its a 35 year sample period dude. its not a mirage stat. stop trying to make me look stupid for pointing it out.I really hope you don't play roulette.
idk why youre making the attempt to make me look foolish? its not an obscure stat at all. we've lost 10 of the last 11 when both teams are ranked.
A) the last 34 years is not a randomly selected period... its the amount of time it's been since alabama has beaten auburn in a game of this weeks circumstances. both teams ranked and bowl eligible.It doesn't seem like you are just pointing it out. It seems like you think it has some bearing on this game. If you don't, that's fine. If you are just pointing out a random stat from a randomly selected period, OK. That's fine, too. But if you think anything that happens on Saturday will be affected, in even the slightest bit, by what happened in 1995, that's where you are going off track.
i could see that point if i was manipulating an obscure stat.. i'm not. How do you look at 1-10 in ranked matchups since bryant retired as anything other than an alarming stat? especially seeing as we had some pretty good teams lose over that span. teams that had a shot to win it all.I don't think he is trying to make you look foolish. The point is that you can make a stat in favor of any team.
Because this was pre-Saban. What other coaches or teams did means absolutely nothing to what will happen on Saturday.i could see that point if i was manipulating an obscure stat.. i'm not. How do you look at 1-10 in ranked matchups since bryant retired as anything other than an alarming stat? especially seeing as we had some pretty good teams lose over that span. teams that had a shot to win it all.
we were up 24-0 on auburn, AND we were favored in that game. just because they were ranked higher than us doesnt mean that wasnt an upset. that was one of the biggest choke jobs in college football history. period.Because this was pre-Saban. What other coaches or teams did means absolutely nothing to what will happen on Saturday.
If you look at since Saban has gotten here..the only "upset" was 2013. But as Bamainboston mentioned in another thread..Auburn was on the rise. They were playing on a high level coming into the Iron Bowl. We were the all around better team...but it was still close. They made fewer mistakes than we did..and it was a crazy way to win.