The girl never had a chance - this whole proceeding was slanted in a way which ensured that Winston would walk. Consider this - there was testimony allowed by Winston and his two witnesses, but no cross-examination allowed. Winston read a 5 page prepared document into testimony. That document included the viewpoints of his two team mates who refused to testify. This would never be allowed in a court of law and I am not sure why it would be allowed in these proceedings. You cannot give testimony for someone else, and you cannot give testimony without the opposition being allowed to cross you against the points offered in that testimony. You can plead the 5th to avoid testimony, but once you testify that right is waived and no longer available. Once Winston read that statement into testimony, he should have been forced to answer questions. If he was not going to answer questions, he should never have been allowed to offer testimony.
What happened here is a farce - a sham that makes the decision not to prosecute look legitimate. I understand that it was not a court of law, but the rules of our court system are in place for a reason. This proceeding ignored those rules and allowed Winston's attorney to twist the process into something which robbed the victim of her right to face her attacker - again.