Pretend for a moment that you are in Rolando's shoes. You play for a team in Texas but have a house in Alabama- a very expensive house that you can't afford to keep up. For some unknown reason ''it would be beneficial to you'' if the house burned to the ground. So, legally, do you think it would it be better for you if it burned while you were in Alabama or in Texas?
I'm told he lost a lot of personal memorabilia, photographs, the kind of thinks people have gone back into burning houses to rescue. In fact, when victims are listing their most precious possessions lost, photographs are always at the top. Just something to think about. Also, I'm very uncomfortable with the slant some of the remarks in this thread have taken. Some of them are almost libelous. Unless we can get back to coloring between the lines, about what we really know, I'm going to close the thread...
