From that article, the reliability stems from a fundamental design issue. the only way to address it is to redesign the rifle from the ground up--as the author suggests--or to just buy a ton of AK-47s.I remember hearing stories about guys dropping their M16's for dead NVA AK47's. I thought reliability of the M16 had changed since then. I guess not so much.
The military has a long history of doing the basic stuff on the cheap while dropping massive amounts on pipe dreams. If we're going to ask people to fight and die for our country, we have an obligation to see that they are properly equipped.
I have pulled a burnt AK (burnt to the point that the wood on the pistol grip was half burned away and the bluing was gone off the metal bits) out of a burnt "Meatball" (MTLB), slapped a magazine into it and fired full auto with no problem.From that article, the reliability stems from a fundamental design issue. the only way to address it is to redesign the rifle from the ground up--as the author suggests--or to just buy a ton of AK-47s.
Yeah, there's no way the guys at Wanat fired that much that fast. It would be physically impossible with a rifle with a 3-round burst.Wow, my dad told me about barrels getting "white hot" and about rounds "cooking off"...but never said anything about weapons catching on fire. Then again, that was close to 1000 rounds in what, 4.5 minutes? And a plastic forearm.
Geoffrey Perett, There's a War to Be Won: The United States Army in World War II, tells of the contest to field a new rifle during the interwar years. There was the "pig test" (shooting a pig to test the lethality of the round), the "goat test," various bullet sizes, etc. The Army and Marine Corps were both involved, but the Marines were sceptical of a semi-automatic rifle, favoring the bolt-action '03 Springfield.
How did the Berettas fail at high rounds? I use FireClean for CLP. It doesn't collect dirt, but I'm still careful not to get it down in the striker channel of my Kahr...I have pulled a burnt AK (burnt to the point that the wood on the pistol grip was half burned away and the bluing was gone off the metal bits) out of a burnt "Meatball" (MTLB), slapped a magazine into it and fired full auto with no problem.
The problem with the AK is that, at ranges beyond 300m, you need to hyper-elevate the muzzle so far, the muzzle obscures the target you are shooting at and you end up "lobbing" bullets towards the target. You might hit something, but this is far from optimal. Engagement ranges in deserts tend to be beyond 300m, putting AK-equipped forces at a disadvantage when facing soldiers equipped with M4, especially if the MA has an ACOG (scope). I'll take that firefight all day long.
As for a new rifle, USSOCOM put out a bid for contracts and adopted the SCAR, which is a short-stroke gas piston operating rifle. It comes in 5.56 and 7.62x51 variants, both with long and short barrels. If the US DoD were to order a few million, I'd bet the per-unit cost would be fairly low.
On the other hand, when the military bought the Baretta, the pistol they tested was not the version they ended up buying. Baretta offered up a top of the line pistol made with high-end metallurgy. The closest competition (and probably the better pistol) was the BHP, but the BHP failed the drop test (load a round, .... the hammer, drop the pistol onto control from 40 feet up, and if the gun goes noff, it's not safe), so the Army bought the Baretta, and then told Baretta it did not want the metal to be as high-grade (and expensive) as the pistol they tested. They wanted the cheaper version, with inferior steel, which has a tendency to fail at high round counts. There used to be a saying in NAVSPECWARCOM, "You ain't a real SEAL until you've eaten Italian steel."
On the Berettas DoD purchased, when you have fired 10,000 rounds or so, the slide barrel assembly will come right off the receiver. Of course, when you fire, the recoil of the slide barrel assembly is normally aimed at your face.How did the Berettas fail at high rounds? I use FireClean for CLP. It doesn't collect dirt, but I'm still careful not to get it down in the striker channel of my Kahr...
I sort of anticipated the slide, after your remark. The slide stop just wasn't robust enough? 10K rounds is a lot to expect out of a sidearm. It seems like you might as well give them practice pistols to wear out and then a combat pistol to put a few hundred rounds through. I just never could work up much love for the Beretta. Of course every brand has its problems and critics...On the Berettas DoD purchased, when you have fired 10,000 rounds or so, the slide barrel assembly will come right off the receiver. Of course, when you fire, the recoil of the slide barrel assembly is normally aimed at your face.
The number of rounds fired by a pistol in a normal Army (non-Special Ops) unit is less than 100/year, so 10,000 is not really a problem.* SEALs, on the other hand, can fire that many rounds through their Barettas pretty quickly, hence the saying about eating Italian steel.
SEAL units of the SEALs I knew fixed this by buying Barettas made from better steel and/or buying BHPs. I don't know what they are shooting now, but I am fairly certain it is not the "off the shelf" DoD Baretta.
* I managed my battalion's ammo account while I was in the 101st Airborne Division and we did not get enough pistol ammo to qualify every pistol shooter every year which was 90 rounds/pistol/year.
I have read that an M16 can be refit with HK416 parts and the impingement action goes awaySome random thoughts...
Not a huge fan of the M16/M4, gas impingement, or the caliber.
Regarding The Atlantic's mention of calibers, there are 6.5 mm versions out there, and with, I think, impingement or piston systems. I've heard some good things about the 6.5, but never fired one myself.
At Wanat, it wasn't just M4's jamming, it was also a mark-19 and SAW's...
http://www.combatreform.org/CALL-Wanat-Final-Report.pdf
http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2010-07/what-really-happened-wanat
http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/occasional_papers/2011/RAND_OP329z1.pdf
Interesting...I have read that an M16 can be refit with HK416 parts and the impingement action goes away
I think the practice pistols were the problem. SEALs just shoot a lot. A LOT.I sort of anticipated the slide, after your remark. The slide stop just wasn't robust enough? 10K rounds is a lot to expect out of a sidearm. It seems like you might as well give them practice pistols to wear out and then a combat pistol to put a few hundred rounds through. I just never could work up much love for the Beretta. Of course every brand has its problems and critics...
Interesting. We have a retired general in the neighborhood (they're all over Huntsville) named John Scales. I'll probe for family - it's not that usual a name. You didn't answer about the failed slide on the Berettas. I'm still presuming the stop...I think the practice pistols were the problem. SEALs just shoot a lot. A LOT.
Every weapon has its advantages and disadvantages.
210 rounds of 5.56 ammo weighs 7.35 pounds.*
210 rounds of AK ammo (7.62mmx39) weighs over 13 pounds.
210 rounds of G3 ammo (7.62mmx54) weighs 12.8 pounds.
210 rounds of AK-74 (5.45mmx39) ammo weighs just under 10 pounds.
Stopping power versus how much ammo you can bring to the fight. If you are dismounted in rugged terrain, 5.56 is a good round. If you are in a vehicle (armored or otherwise), I'd prefer 7.62mmx54. It is more likely to put a guy on his butt. I like the Beretta's magazine capacity more than the M1911, but the 9mm round is not as effective as the .45, for the same reason.
Getting back to the opening post, Scales is just fishing for more Army money at the Air Force's expense.
* James Dunnigan, How to Make War, pg. 41.
The slide barrel assembly comes plum off the receiver when fired, hitting the shooter in the face. The piece that stops the slide barrel assembly from coming off just breaks and the slide just keeps recoiling at the shooter. It has never happened to me, but I would assume the lip on the bottom front of the slide assembly (the place into which you put the recoil spring and the recoil guide) just breaks and the slide just keeps going backwards (i.e. towards the shooter).Interesting. We have a retired general in the neighborhood (they're all over Huntsville) named John Scales. I'll probe for family - it's not that usual a name. You didn't answer about the failed slide on the Berettas. I'm still presuming the stop...
John Scales. Old SF guy. I have met him, but do not know him well. An alum of Lee High of Huntsville, I believe.Interesting. We have a retired general in the neighborhood (they're all over Huntsville) named John Scales. I'll probe for family - it's not that usual a name.