Yeah that's an old dig at one of our other posters.Grrrrrrrr!
Wrong. Obamacare math would be 2+2=3That's Obamacare math.
Oh...OK. I was thinking about the tax bill on medical devices.Wrong. Obamacare math would be 2+2=3
Cause it lowers costs.
Hadn't thought of it that way but maybe Orwell was on to something. He should have called it 2014, though.That's Obamacare math.
As it's often tossed out - India and China have more honor students then we have students. We're not going to out-manufacture either of those countries long-term and if we can't keep up intellectually, we're dooming our children and grandchildren to playing catchup. Assuming they can.This could actually make a lot of sense, maybe if they push it back into the high school system it would cut drop outs. We really need to try to use education as a way to make people successful instead of making them able to pass a test......
Yet corporate espionage is their biggest generator of IPAs it's often tossed out - India and China have more honor students then we have students. We're not going to out-manufacture either of those countries long-term and if we can't keep up intellectually, we're dooming our children and grandchildren to playing catchup. Assuming they can.
Last week, President Barack Obama announced his latest plan to buy back the political support of struggling young Americans. Dubbed “America’s College Promise,” the program would allow “responsible students” to attend community college tuition-free.
It’s a curious proposition because affordability is not a barrier to enrollment in community colleges, unlike four-year universities. The president’s plan says community college costs about $3,800 a year, although the College Board reports average annual tuition at community colleges is $3,300. Either of those figures might seem high for low-income families, but the figure represents a full course schedule. About two-thirds of community college students attend part-time, because they also work. Plus, students can qualify for financial aid to offset what is already a good value.
Paying for everyone's Community College is not going to cut the Drop-out rate. You have toooooo many young people that are forced to be where they don't want to be unless they are going to be there to socialize. Many are just toooooo immature to make good decisions for their educational and financial future.This could actually make a lot of sense, maybe if they push it back into the high school system it would cut drop outs. We really need to try to use education as a way to make people successful instead of making them able to pass a test......
What is the definition of a RESPONSIBLE student?http://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorial-free-community-college
Last week, President Barack Obama announced his latest plan to buy back the political support of struggling young Americans. Dubbed “America’s College Promise,” the program would allow “responsible students” to attend community college tuition-free.
It’s a curious proposition because affordability is not a barrier to enrollment in community colleges, unlike four-year universities. The president’s plan says community college costs about $3,800 a year, although the College Board reports average annual tuition at community colleges is $3,300. Either of those figures might seem high for low-income families, but the figure represents a full course schedule. About two-thirds of community college students attend part-time, because they also work. Plus, students can qualify for financial aid to offset what is already a good value.
Two years of junior college won't make American students substantially more competitive -- "garbage in, garbage out " as the saying goes. If there is an issue with our education system, it is one of expectations. We are more concerned with dumbing down expectations so more people can "succeed".IMO, and just making a point here...
What made the US a superpower was the ability to 'out-muscle' the rest of the world, specifically in manufacturing. From the 1940's (thanks, WW2) through much of the 1990's, the US could build things better and cheaper than the rest of the world. But as industrialization grew in China and India, we find them where we were 60 years ago - lots of laborers happy to work for relatively low dough while in the US we (rightly so) have a lot of regulations in place the essentially add to the cost of manufacturing. We cannot out-manufacture China anymore, that ship has sailed. They can do it as good and cheaper than we can.
The ONLY thing we can rely on right now, despite the fact that India and China have more honor students then the US has students, is that we have more disposable income that either of them, per capita. This means that if you want your kids to be able to compete in a world that's no longer 1950, most white-collar jobs are competing globally - your kids and grandkids will be competing not against the kids in their high school, but those in EVERY high school all over the world. Things change.
So honestly, if you care about the US and the future we're leaving for our kids and grandkids, we need to think along the lines of what we need to do to empower the next few generations to compete, even dominate on the world stage. American exceptionalism was borne from intellectual drive and muscle. We don't have the muscle anymore, so we need to make the best of the intellectual drive.
Don't lost the forest for the trees. Too much focus on ideals while ignoring reality will cause failure, every time...
It's time to give up the idea that every young person has to go to college, and start offering high-school seniors an alternative route into the middle class.