Y'all gonna put up with me win or lose, just like last year.We may have to ban AUDub since it's Auburn week.
Y'all gonna put up with me win or lose, just like last year.We may have to ban AUDub since it's Auburn week.
When are you going to get a graduate degree from Alabama? I do NOT want to hear: W H F O!Y'all gonna put up with me win or lose, just like last year.
Blah, blah, blah..............no, NOAA never revises the data. They do. They even announce when they do. And it is almost always a downgrading of temperature. Just because it gets buried in the news, and you may have missed it, does not mean it never happened.
Thats almost as crazy as those denying that there is any global warming.Not only has global warming caused ISIS, it caused................get ready for it..................
Schicklgruber & Co.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/11/25/global-warming-caused-hitler/
When a theory explains everything, it really explains nothing.
Et tu, Hulk?O'Dumbo and Gov. Moonbeam are (almost) more dangerous than I am!
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...lo-obama-almost-worse-climate-change-deniers/
Not sure how they will be able to sleep at night.
I think you are missing the point. There is no global conspiracy. NOAA does revise data to account for error in measuring, not to make the data seem worse. Every time they do revise data is in the public forum, subject to peer review. If for some reason nearly every scientist in the world is wrong that humans are altering the climate science, it is not due to some big conspiracy. To me that argument always sounds like it is coming from people with tin foil hats.Blah, blah, blah..............no, NOAA never revises the data. They do. They even announce when they do. And it is almost always a downgrading of temperature. Just because it gets buried in the news, and you may have missed it, does not mean it never happened.
No, it is never a huge change; just a few tenths. Which takes the "hottest year ever" down to just another year.
What they do not explain is why it takes them a year or so, to pour over all the data, to come up with the revised data. Probably because when it takes so long no one pays attention.
While true, the rise in "deniers" has been almost entirely along party lines. In other words, many republican voters have become "deniers," while the same can't be said for democratic voters.Recent polls indicate a growing number of us are becoming deniers. Maybe because the long list of predicted calamities has failed to materialize. :biggrin2:
Few have claimed democrats were smart. ��While true, the rise in "deniers" has been almost entirely along party lines. In other words, many republican voters have become "deniers," while the same can't be said for democratic voters.
Have you ever wondered why that is?.While true, the rise in "deniers" has been almost entirely along party lines. In other words, many republican voters have become "deniers," while the same can't be said for democratic voters.
gullibility? brain damage? democrats seem to believe everything someone tells them. bonjourHave you ever wondered why that is?.
The same can be said for republican voters. It seems they are just following what the oil and gas industry is telling them to believe. Many of those anti-climate change "articles" are funded directly by the oil and gas industry. Also you should look at campaign contributions to those that deny climate change is caused by man. You will find a ton of contributions from the oil and gas industry. Coincidence? Or is someone pulling the strings? Do republican voters think for themselves? (see what I did there?)gullibility? brain damage? democrats seem to believe everything someone tells them. bonjour
and the other side is just penniless? the problem with the whole thing is both sides are making too much money off their "facts". my solution? screw it, we will be long dead if we are destroying the Earth and if we aren't even better.The same can be said for republican voters. It seems they are just following what the oil and gas industry is telling them to believe. Many of those anti-climate change "articles" are funded directly by the oil and gas industry. Also you should look at campaign contributions to those that deny climate change is caused by man. You will find a ton of contributions from the oil and gas industry. Coincidence? Or is someone pulling the strings? Do republican voters think for themselves? (see what I did there?)
I really hate this argument. While it is true that scientists do earn a salary based on research grants, do you really believe that their compensation is similar to CEOs of oil/gas industry? How many scientists do you see with a yacht or a private plane? (Maybe just Al Gore)and the other side is just penniless? the problem with the whole thing is both sides are making too much money off their "facts". my solution? screw it, we will be long dead if we are destroying the Earth and if we aren't even better.
there are alternative fuel people that stand to make some $$$$$I really hate this argument. While it is true that scientists do earn a salary based on research grants, do you really believe that their compensation is similar to CEOs of oil/gas industry? How many scientists do you see with a yacht or a private plane? (Maybe just Al Gore)
NSF had a total budget of 7.6 billion in FY2014. This includes research in ALL areas of science not just climate change research.
Exxon Mobile's revenue - $394 billion
There is really no comparison in the oil and gas industry vs. the research expenditures on climate change research.
However, I will say that your "solution" is definitely the most likely outcome.
Everyone is a denier in this argument. Republicans who deny climate change on any level, and Democrats who deny the economic and standard-of-living depression that would result from doing everything necessary to dial back time (because they deny the expansion of nuclear energy, or absent doing everything necessary, deny the fact that we'll have no meaningful downward impact on global temperatures otherwise).While true, the rise in "deniers" has been almost entirely along party lines. In other words, many republican voters have become "deniers," while the same can't be said for democratic voters.