it's a classic in my line of work.that was funny
it would be funnier if I hadn't experienced it so often
it's a classic in my line of work.that was funny
have they had more than one debate? the only one i can find is the one in feb. 2014For the record Ken Ham is a nut job. Not a big fan of his whatsoever.
I've watched A LOT of debates in which Bill Nye and Ken Ham have been apart of. Neither has ever even hinted that they could be wrong. If so I missed it. I watched Nye write out a formula to "prove" he was right that had assumed constants with values assigned to them that had about as much credibility as me drawing numbers out of a hat. If he wants my respect (which he couldn't care less if died tomorrow) he would present his evidence and say "this is what I believe and why" without prancing it around like there's no way it could be wrong. Both Ham and Nye do this. It's arrogance and thinking very highly of oneself at its best.
it's a classic in my line of work.
it would be funnier if I hadn't experienced it so often
They may (as do others) participate in a "debate circuit" of some sorts. I know Christopher Hitchens and some other guy (can't think of his name) would go from college to college or church to church debating. I'm not sure if Nye and Ham are apart of this or not. But I know they both participate in debates on a frequent basis.have they had more than one debate? the only one i can find is the one in feb. 2014
and generally speaking, "assumed" constants are not pulled out of thin air.
thx, i didn't know if it was like the leary/liddy thing (debate series) or not.They may (as do others) participate in a "debate circuit" of some sorts. I know Christopher Hitchens and some other guy (can't think of his name) would go from college to college or church to church debating. I'm not sure if Nye and Ham are apart of this or not. But I know they both participate in debates on a frequent basis.
I wanted to go to the one with Hitchens but never could get one close enough to go. Though I disagreed with a lot of his stuff I enjoyed listening to him present his case. Hated that he passed away.thx, i didn't know if it was like the leary/liddy thing (debate series) or not.
In my line of work (computer systems analyst), I get my fair share too.it's a classic in my line of work.
it would be funnier if I hadn't experienced it so often
I would still hope for the inquisitive mouse to desire a testable hypothesis with the potential to rule out the possibility of a piano that plays itselfSince it is obviously going there anyway, Explaining my position on God is like the old mice in the piano parable. Like the inquisitive mouse, we can sometimes figure out how some things work (the beautiful sound is just coming from string vibrations). We can also identify causes and effects (the vibrations were caused by hammers hitting the strings) and miss the fact that someone is playing the piano. Values that have been have in history deemed constant are continually found not to be so constant. I believe it is obvious that something is at work besides random occurrences that statistically were bound to happen in a universe the size and scope of ours. That is layer of my belief system, but not the only thing that makes me believe.
he would probably just discover a watchmakerI would still hope for the inquisitive mouse to desire a testable hypothesis with the potential to rule out the possibility of a piano that plays itself
Gonzo mouse!I would still hope for the inquisitive mouse to desire a testable hypothesis with the potential to rule out the possibility of a piano that plays itself