But, will the American public ever know the REAL TRUTH? I doubt it!!!!!!!
Hillary's E-Mail Problem
- Thread starter ValuJet
- Start date
But, will the American public ever know the REAL TRUTH? I doubt it!!!!!!!
Maybe, just maybe. Turns out they WERE doing a cloud backup of the server using a separate firm:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article37968711.html
This could really get interesting if what they get from the backups do not line up with her story, and if they recover work related ones that were deleted.
I'm not sure if people on this board know what Special Access Program (SAP) information is (if not, google it). SAP is not a classification category. It is a handling category. And release of SAP info is very serious.
But SAP info was found on Hillary's email server.
Not that anybody cares.
The real story today is not that very, very sensitive info was released in violation of law, but that the investigator was colluding with Senate Republicans. That is the real story, apparently.
But SAP info was found on Hillary's email server.
Not that anybody cares.
The real story today is not that very, very sensitive info was released in violation of law, but that the investigator was colluding with Senate Republicans. That is the real story, apparently.
From your link TW.
So far, State Department officials insist, none of the emails that have been released were marked as classified at the time they were sent, but some 1,340 have been upgraded to classified retroactively ahead of their public release and redacted accordingly.
Why don't you leave that poor women alone?
So far, State Department officials insist, none of the emails that have been released were marked as classified at the time they were sent, but some 1,340 have been upgraded to classified retroactively ahead of their public release and redacted accordingly.
Why don't you leave that poor women alone?
If you're saying that Hillary is not smart enough to discern what should be confidential and what is not, then I agree with you.
I have the quaint notion that the law should be enforced and that those who aspire to positions of leadership should be held to the highest of standards.
No classified documents are ever marked "classified." That is not a classification level.
Edgar said:
Can someone please tell me what the draw is to this woman and how she stays so successful and out of jail? I haven't run across any Hillary backers or they won't speak up but how can someone who dodged sniper fire (not), had nothing to do with Benghazi (wrong), the email classification problem (it's confidential, secret, top secret - throw in FOUO and SCI if you want) continue to have that many supporters. I think I left Whitewater out along with a few other things. It boggles the mind that we have become that numb that we don't hold those accountable who are supposed to be our leaders.
ETA - correct classifications - you would think I would know having to deal with it daily.
ETA - correct classifications - you would think I would know having to deal with it daily.
Last edited:
That's the ''Clinton lawyer'' in her coming through. (i.e. Bill's 'It depends on what your meaning of the word IS, is'). She can lie through her teeth while technically telling the truth.
Yes and the sad thing is there are people who'll buy it lock stock and barrel. Romney talked about the 47%.
To be clear, the Left cares about the Left. Right or wrong, legal or not, moral or not makes no difference. Nothing else matters - ever.
Not an article about her E-Mail issues, but Camile Paglia has an interesting take on HRC. She is one of the people I respect enough to read what she puts out, but usually disagree with. There are a few lapses into psychobabble, but I do think she is on to something:
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/27/cam..._men_first_feminism_may_prove_costly_in_2016/
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/27/cam..._men_first_feminism_may_prove_costly_in_2016/
But they are called classified. Used to be confidential, secret and top secret. You sure she broke the law?
People or person?
United States v. Libby[edit]
The federal trial United States v. Libby began on January 16, 2007. On March 6, 2007, Libby was convicted on four counts, and was acquitted of one count of making false statements.[SUP][20][/SUP][SUP][21][/SUP][SUP][22][/SUP] Libby was sentenced to 30 months in prison, a fine of US$250,000, and two years of supervised release after his prison term.[SUP][23][/SUP][SUP][24][/SUP]After the verdict, Special Counsel Fitzgerald stated that he did not expect anyone else to be charged in the case: "We're all going back to our day jobs."[SUP][22][/SUP] On July 2, 2007, President Bush commuted Libby's jail sentence, effectively erasing the 30 months he was supposed to spend in jail. The federal felony conviction, probation and fines still remain.
In March 2008, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that the investigation had cost $2.58 million. The GAO also reported that "this matter is now concluded for all practical purposes."[SUP][25]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plame_affair[/SUP]
Look, the family that gave us the legal principle that "That depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is," can parse words with the best of them.
No classified document is labeled "classified." They are labeled "Confidential," "Secret," or "Top Secret." When I used to work on classified systems, I never saw a document labeled "Classified."
I am not sure she broke the law. That is why we have investigators, Grand Juries and trials.
From the perspective of considering her as a candidate, her flippancy about all of this bothers me just as much as any law breaking. She acts like she didn't know that sensitive information was there when ANYONE in her position would. If she didn't she certainly wasn't qualified to be Secretary of State.
As someone who was around right in the middle of the fallout from the Walker ring (I was doing the same job on another boat, and actually knew Whitworth in passing) I have seen people pay some pretty heavy prices for much less when improperly handling sensitive material.
Last edited:
She acts more like she's above the law, and how dare we ask about what she's doing. Iow, what she does is none of anyone's business but her own.
Of course, but when dealing with the Clinton's one must parse words carefully.
I have never received a document marked "Classified." I have received (on authorized systems) lots of classified documents.
Latest threads
-
No. 1 Visits Tuscaloosa for Second Straight Week as Alabama Hosts Top-Ranked Texas A&M- Started by Diamond Tide
- Replies: 0
-
-
I'm Declaring the Emporer has no clothes (NCAA rules implosion)- Started by BamaNation
- Replies: 19
-
Home-and-Home Series Wraps Up as Alabama Welcomes UAB on Tuesday
- Started by Diamond Tide
- Replies: 1
-
-
A huge win today at my doctor's office...- Started by uafan4life
- Replies: 4