Stock up now.I'm not sure how they can deal with this one - and it's huge.
And this affects all of us as California leads the US in production of:
Almonds
Apricots
Artichokes
Asparagus
Avocados
Beans, Dry Lima Bedding/Garden Plants Broccoli
Brussels Sprouts Cabbage, Chinese Cabbage, F.M. Carrots Cauliflower Celery
Chicory
Cotton, American Pima Daikon
Dates
Eggplant
Escarole/Endive
Figs
Flowers, Bulbs Flowers, Cut
Flowers, Potted Plants Garlic
Grapes, Raisins
Grapes, Table Grapes, Wine Greens, Mustard Hay, Alfalfa Herbs
Kale
Kiwifruit
Kumquats Lemons
Lettuce, Head Lettuce, Leaf Lettuce, Romaine
Limes
Melons, Cantaloupe Melons, Honeydew Milk
Milk Goats
Nectarines
Nursery, Bedding Plants Nursery Crops
Olives
Onions, Dry
Onions, Green
Parsley
Peaches, Clingstone Peaches, Freestone Pears, Bartlett
Peppers, Bell Persimmons
Pigeons and Squabs Pistachios
Plums
Plums, Dried
Pluots
Pomegranates
Raspberries
Rice, Sweet
Safflower
Seed, Alfalfa
Seed, Bermuda Grass Seed, Ladino Clover Seed, Vegetable and Flower Spinach
Strawberries
Tangelos
Tangerines
Tomatoes, Processing Vegetables, Greenhouse Vegetables, Oriental Walnuts
Wild Rice
I don't think there's anywhere near the capacity to pull this off - the USGS estimates that California needs 38 billion gallons per day...It's almost to the point of sucking it up and paying the price for desalination.
FIFY...I don't think there's anywhere near the capacity to pull this off - the USGS estimates that California THINKS IT NEEDS 38 billion gallons per day...
Good point, although more than 80% of the water used is for agriculture - not a lot of give in that world without production dropping off dramatically. And we (the rest of the country) need that production.FIFY...
the change over to nuts (almonds, etc) from fruits in recent years has sucked up a ton of water, as those crops tend to be more water intensive.Good point, although more than 80% of the water used is for agriculture - not a lot of give in that world without production dropping off dramatically. And we (the rest of the country) need that production.
Don't know, but judging by the number of cotton fields around here, I'd say no.Do farmers in the south still get paid to not grow cotton while California cotton growers need irrigation to grow cotton in the desert?
I wasn't being clear enough. California irrigation is notoriously inefficient, probably because they felt there was unlimited water underground. They need to look east to Israel for an example. There's been some increase in drip over sheet irrigation in CA, but not nearly the response needed in the face of the urgent situation...Good point, although more than 80% of the water used is for agriculture - not a lot of give in that world without production dropping off dramatically. And we (the rest of the country) need that production.
This is absolutely true. For so many years, they abused their share of Colorado River water and now the areas to the east take their quota, leaving CA hanging out on a limb. And the overall quantity of CO River water keeps going down. There have been a lot of cities built and grown in places where no city should even have been built and where they can't be sustained, based on the unlimited water mirage. There are going to be some hard choices to be made over the next 30 years or so...They've been kicking this can down the road for years. 20% of the state's energy use is water related. They pump water 100's of miles to where the population and agriculture has outgrown the water supply. It was only a matter of time.
Then there's the environmental pov. (i.e., stopping irrigation to thousands of square miles of fruit orchards so that they can protect the habitat of a mouse.)I wasn't being clear enough. California irrigation is notoriously inefficient, probably because they felt there was unlimited water underground. They need to look east to Israel for an example. There's been some increase in drip over sheet irrigation in CA, but not nearly the response needed in the face of the urgent situation...
This might not really be that big of a deal. How many NASA scientists are there? :wink:California has one year's worth of water remaining per NASA scientist
So very true. Long range planning seems to be a lost concept in many areas.This is absolutely true. For so many years, they abused their share of Colorado River water and now the areas to the east take their quota, leaving CA hanging out on a limb. And the overall quantity of CO River water keeps going down. There have been a lot of cities built and grown in places where no city should even have been built and where they can't be sustained, based on the unlimited water mirage. There are going to be some hard choices to be made over the next 30 years or so...
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-famiglietti-drought-california-20150313-story.htmlAccording to the latest federal forecast, released Wednesday, the reservoir is expected to fall to a new record low next month and slip downward from there, shedding a total of about 20 feet through June 2016.
The bleak new estimate is based on current projections pointing to below-average flows on the Colorado in the coming months, as the snow pack melts in the mountains that feed the river and its tributaries.
Short term sacrifice for long term gain is a lost concept everywhere. Not many adults understand the concept, and it seems to be just about zero for anybody under 30.So very true. Long range planning seems to be a lost concept in many areas.