I see lots of description of a perceived "problem" on how he addressed the questions he was expectedly bombarded with. But no solutions.
Do tell, how would you have handled this, time after time? I mean, the guy can't ignore his media responsibilities, during Sweet 16/Elite 8 week!
You didn't like his "honesty". So, you prefer a lie? Or a "no comment", which really is a comment to the media?
Tell, me, what is a "win" here for him, besides what he might tell his players behind closed doors?
Could it be that they lost last night, simply because the Irish were the better team last night?