We may not know for a while, but it appears that Scott Tased the officer...I'm still not sure who tased who.:conf2:
We may not know for a while, but it appears that Scott Tased the officer...I'm still not sure who tased who.:conf2:
Hmmm...not the action of an innocent man in my opinion.We don't really even know the officer's side of the story, since he refused to speak with investigators...
If that is the case why is the PD not making it known and allowing the opposite narrative to go on unchallenged?:conf2:We may not know for a while, but it appears that Scott Tased the officer...
You are misunderstanding the role of the PD. Their job is to investigate, assemble the evidence and turn it over to the DA, who issues any statements, unless the judge gags him/her. Sure there are situations across the country where the PD gets out ahead of the DA and sometimes even at odds. That doesn't mean it's the way the process is supposed to work...If that is the case why is the PD not making it known and allowing the opposite narrative to go on unchallenged?:conf2:
Well I am not sure I would in this case if I was him either. He was immediately let go. My guess is that he is very wary of the investigators. He probably correctly has assessed that he is not going to get any support from the department. He has the right to and probably has lawyered up.Hmmm...not the action of an innocent man in my opinion.
Enjoy solitary, because that's his only refuge.
You can say that again...Enjoy solitary, because that's his only refuge.
This one seemed a little more straight forward to me, but I'm just an accountant and pretend to be a lawyer on the internet.11-1 hung jury. He may not be completely out of the woods, but at least one juror was somehow willing to see that as a justified shooting.
Like it or not, that implies a lot about our society.