How are we now at risk?:conf2:No, what bothers me is a former SOS and a candidate for POTUS as well as a former First Lady to a POTUS nicknamed Slick Willie redefining sleaze and corruption and probably putting our country at risk. That freaking really bothers me and it should bother anyone with walking around sense.
We are at risk because we now have Russians controlling the uranium, exporting it back to Russia and then selling it to Iran.
Dont the Russians already have all they need? We already have much of it powering our reactors.
Someone who is selling something to someone else (like Russia is to Iran) can never have "all they need". How will we power those reactors if Russia takes our (their) entire supply and exports it?
money laundering
Its for charity (not counting the 600k)
*LIKE*No, what bothers me is a former SOS and a candidate for POTUS as well as a former First Lady to a POTUS nicknamed Slick Willie redefining sleaze and corruption and probably putting our country at risk. That freaking really bothers me and it should bother anyone with walking around sense.
When it comes to the words and actions of fellow Democrats, Bamaro and others here on the left are as biased as they are deaf and blind. They cannot bring themselves to step back, look at it objectively and think for themselves.
How much of the $250,000,000 actually goes to charties, and how much goes to Clinton cronies and family members?
Awe I see, it's okay for other countries to "buy" favorable foreign policies as long as the proceeds go to charity.
Yep its crazy...yet my son can't even work for one of the local farmers because of the "appearance" of a conflict of interest with my job.
I agree that both sides have SLIME, but I think the Progressives have taken SLIME to an even greater level.
Shutting it down is one option. Changing the name of it and removing all family affiliation is another option.I wish that some of you would show the outrage to politicians on all sides who spend much of time courting the well healed donors that you focus on a charitable foundation mainly because it is headed by BC.
If HC should win it all, should the foundation be shut down for 4 years?
This whole thing along with a bevy of other issues should be enough to keep her from winning it all.I wish that some of you would show the outrage to politicians on all sides who spend much of time courting the well healed donors that you focus on a charitable foundation mainly because it is headed by BC.
If HC should win it all, should the foundation be shut down for 4 years?
fify
