I agree. Lotto alone won't generate enough money to fix the issues. It may be part of the solution, but it isn't THE solution.As will I. Pour more money into a broken system. Still got a broken system.
I agree. Lotto alone won't generate enough money to fix the issues. It may be part of the solution, but it isn't THE solution.As will I. Pour more money into a broken system. Still got a broken system.
Yeah we do a pool at work whenever it gets in the 200's. I just think it is as an insurance policy to not be the last person standing in my group at my company.the only time we ever buy a lottery ticket is when the power ball goes over $250 million.
And the lottery commission thanks you for your contributions.Yeah we do a pool at work whenever it gets in the 200's. I just think it is as an insurance policy to not be the last person standing in my group at my company.
Couldn't have said it better. IMO a lottery is among the worst revenue streams to base a budget on.There are arguments for a lottery, and you can make them. But to throw a lottery together to close a budget gap created by fundamental structural problems is a foolish endeavor. It might be a temporary solution, but long term it will only make things worse.
If the folks in those states want to throw their money away on foolish endeavors, that's their decision, and their problem. I see no compelling reason though, why we in Alabama should follow suit.
Fwiw, I've said on many occasions that I don't gamble, neither here or in any other place or state. Otoh, I have no objections to others throwing their own money away if they so choose. But I don't think the state should put themselves (or us) in the business of promoting or enabling it.
i usually just scrape together the change laying in my car and on the counter and buy a couple of $2 ticketsYeah we do a pool at work whenever it gets in the 200's. I just think it is as an insurance policy to not be the last person standing in my group at my company.
lots of folks have benefited from the Hope scholarship in jawjuh too.The lottery is probably a bad idea as a method to shore up poor budgeting by lawmakers.
That said, while there are plenty of arguments that I understand against it, I've always leaned towards libertarianism - I don't think the government's role is to 'protect people from potentially poor choices' (whether that's gambling, drugs, whatever - as long as it's not directly impinging on another's rights, why should the government have any say in its legality?)...
On the flip side, TN has benefited substantially from the lottery wrt secondary education - between Hope Scholarships and the new Tennessee Promise program, the decision to have a lottery that was passed by voters has been very beneficial to young people trying to find their way either via college or trade / technical schools.
If it's on the ballot, I'll participate... with a no vote.If you don't approve of a lottery just don't participate.
I agree that it is not the role to protect people from poor choices, only the consequences of those choices on others. It is something entirely different to encourage those poor choices. Again just my opinion.The lottery is probably a bad idea as a method to shore up poor budgeting by lawmakers.
That said, while there are plenty of arguments that I understand against it, I've always leaned towards libertarianism - I don't think the government's role is to 'protect people from potentially poor choices' (whether that's gambling, drugs, whatever - as long as it's not directly impinging on another's rights, why should the government have any say in its legality?)...
On the flip side, TN has benefited substantially from the lottery wrt secondary education - between Hope Scholarships and the new Tennessee Promise program, the decision to have a lottery that was passed by voters has been very beneficial to young people trying to find their way either via college or trade / technical schools.
I second this.The lottery is probably a bad idea as a method to shore up poor budgeting by lawmakers.
That said, while there are plenty of arguments that I understand against it, I've always leaned towards libertarianism - I don't think the government's role is to 'protect people from potentially poor choices' (whether that's gambling, drugs, whatever - as long as it's not directly impinging on another's rights, why should the government have any say in its legality?)...
On the flip side, TN has benefited substantially from the lottery wrt secondary education - between Hope Scholarships and the new Tennessee Promise program, the decision to have a lottery that was passed by voters has been very beneficial to young people trying to find their way either via college or trade / technical schools.
I used to describe a lottery as a tax on stupidity. The stupider you are, the higher the tax.Even if it was steady and did not cause any issues. IMO a government encouraging their citizens to do something stupid as a revenue stream is just wrong.
LOL school teachers are not immune to acts of stupidity, but don't tell my teacher wife I said soI used to describe a lottery as a tax on stupidity. The stupider you are, the higher the tax.
Then I used that line with a school teacher. She said, "I buy lottery tickets every week."
Since then, I have rephrased it as "a tax on irrational hope."
I'm not sure that is true . I know a guy that works for a company making scratch off lotto tickets. He said the payout is in the 80%+ range on those. So it can't be a 38% tax.It really is a tax on poor folks. I believe I read somewhere, that it is around a 38% tax for every dollar spent.
Was this teacher a history teacher? Crossing my fingers that it wasn't a math teacher.I used to describe a lottery as a tax on stupidity. The stupider you are, the higher the tax.
Then I used that line with a school teacher. She said, "I buy lottery tickets every week."
Since then, I have rephrased it as "a tax on irrational hope."