It's very easy to criticize without offering suggestions. It's also easy to look at numbers without context. Furthermore, it is easy to take reported numbers at face value without questioning them.
It's also easy gloss over glaring problems. It's also easy to refute numbers someone has researched without doing your own (or finding someone else's) research to refute it with actual evidence. It's also easy to simply take law enforcement's side as they are generally considered more credible than thugs and thieves.
I've said this before, but I used to simply take the cop's side and believe his story. Then video evidence proved I shouldn't always do that.
I personally know some good cops. A friend's brother was killed in the line of duty.
I personally know a cop that abuses his power, preys on old people, lies to cover his backside, and is a wife-beating teenage girls ogling general creep that has no business working security at a video rental store, much less in actual law enforcement.
Unarmed people are not always not dangerous. True enough. Can't always tell if a gun is real or a toy. Fair enough. But man, I have seen some pretty unsettling things. Like a kid shot in a park. Like a guy in Walmart carrying a toy gun - in an open carry state, no less (even for real guns) - killed without any attempt to determine if he was a real threat.
I've seen a homeless man taken down like a dog. I've seen unarmed fleeing men shot in the back. I've seen a guy selling cigarettes for Pete's sake taken down (without a gun involved). I've seen no-knock raids go horribly wrong with innocent people killed because they thought they were being attacked by intruders - and sometimes the police were at the wrong house to begin with or got a warrant with only the "evidence" of an informant's word.
I've seen cops shot dead an unarmed mentally ill man. Heard plenty of other stories similar to it. One recently was a suicidal guy with a knife in his bedroom whose S.O. had called for help getting him safely to a psych facility. There are several similar stories out there.
And as far as the drug trade, if it weren't a crime with harsher penalties than physically killing someone then the black market crime would not exist, nor the violence that goes along with it. And every cop out there would not use it as an all-in excuse to violate our inalienable rights. Not that I give those violent criminals a pass. I don't. But too many minorities are killed. Sometimes without justification.
And if you so much as threaten to kill a cop, that's on you.
Cops have a hard job. They are sometimes in horrible situations. Most do their best. Some pay with their lives. And that should never happen in a just world.
But there is (as Selma rightly said) no reason to pin anarchy up against a blank check for police to kill people. We HAVE to criticize police. And if they can't handle public criticism they should choose another profession. We HAVE to examine not only misconduct, but also better ways of policing to prevent police shootings that are preventable.
I can only bring up the health care field for comparison. We are very critical of ourselves, not to mention the public is always evaluating us. what we are paid by insurance will even soon depend on those evaluations. But we look for ways to prevent deaths that are preventable. Because the public depends on us. They place their faith in us. They place their very lives in our hands. Because it is our ethical and moral responsibility to do the right thing.
And it's really not much different with cops. They are given great power over life, death, and freedom. They have a responsibility to the public. So no one should get upset when the public says to them, "You need to do better".
Frankly, I've always felt that most of the answers to how to do better will have to come from within the policing community in cooperation with the public. Many in the public can offer suggestions, but it will be up to cops how to implement them in a safe way.
But the conversation has to start somewhere. And the first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. I don't believe closing ranks solves a single problem any more than false accusations do.
What I'm hoping for is some middle ground that keeps cops safe, but that keeps the public more safe as well. To be truly effective, that effort will have to reach far and wide ranging from how cops interact with the public to changing the very laws we ask police to enforce.
And just because we criticize cops does not mean we don't support them.