And Southerners continue to over represent in today's military...hmmm...makes one think.Well, think about it. How do you get a Johnny Reb to fight for slaveholders back home, when they had nothing to gain from it? You tell them a lie...
And Southerners continue to over represent in today's military...hmmm...makes one think.Well, think about it. How do you get a Johnny Reb to fight for slaveholders back home, when they had nothing to gain from it? You tell them a lie...
I have lost track of which thread this should be posted in, into which thread it fits most neatly, but I thought it was worth a read.
The Flag Controversy: We Did It To Ourselves
The stumbling block is that Americans, including Southerners, hate complexity. ... When James McPherson, ... produced his book, What They Fought For, he found that the vast majority of troops north and south did not view slavery or its abolition as the casus belli; most Billy Yanks and Johnny Rebs viewed the contest as a defense of union, constitution, and hearth. The response to such findings is not to ask searching questions, but to either ignore the evidence or perhaps claim that the ordinary soldier was a dupe.
I see you choose option B.Well, think about it. How do you get a Johnny Reb to fight for slaveholders back home, when they had nothing to gain from it? You tell them a lie...
Well said. I would recommend Jams McPherson's book, For Cause and Comrades. McPherson is a northerner and a fairly radical leftist (he does interviews on the World Socialist Web Site from time to time). McPherson examined, in a statistically rigorous manner, the letters from Union and Confederate soldiers. What he found surprised him. Both said they were "fighting for the Union of our fathers." Northern soldiers for this great Union of states, united. Confederates for a Union under a Constitution with limited powers for the central government, and a Union based on consent of the people of the states.It's hard for me to consider that many people were duped by the politicians and plantation owners to walk away from there small farms and young families to defend the right to own slaves. What I can believe is that they felt like their homeland was at risk from a Government that didn't listen to their elected officials; something their immediate ancestors had come across an ocean to avoid and had fought a war in the recent past to rectify. I have no doubt that some politicians and large land holders had ulterior motives, the same type that has motivated like minded men in every war ever fought. However, this still doesn't detract from the motivation of the average southerner leaving his farm or small town to rally to their cause. They might have not been very educated but I don't choose to believe that they were mindless dupes incapable of reaching their own decisions for their own reasons. It seems to me that their were a fair amount of lies told by those people dressed in blue and their Government,industrialists etc. also.
the csa utilized conscription as well as relying on volunteers. iirc, men who owned over a certain number of slaves were exempt (at least for a while).It's hard for me to consider that many people were duped by the politicians and plantation owners to walk away from there small farms and young families to defend the right to own slaves. What I can believe is that they felt like their homeland was at risk from a Government that didn't listen to their elected officials; something their immediate ancestors had come across an ocean to avoid and had fought a war in the recent past to rectify. I have no doubt that some politicians and large land holders had ulterior motives, the same type that has motivated like minded men in every war ever fought. However, this still doesn't detract from the motivation of the average southerner leaving his farm or small town to rally to their cause. They might have not been very educated but I don't choose to believe that they were mindless dupes incapable of reaching their own decisions for their own reasons. It seems to me that their were a fair amount of lies told by those people dressed in blue and their Government,industrialists etc. also.
Yep. That is correct. 20 slave exemption. Either the owner or the overseer was exempt (but not both). The idea (officially) was someone needed to make the plantation run and the unstated rationale was that someone needed to stay on the plantation to protect the women. Rape was not that common, but Blazing Saddles jokes aside, that was a common fear among white women (being raped) and white men (their womenfolk being raped in their absence). After the cry went up about the 20-slave exemption, even that went away and the final conscription law drafted every white man between 17 and 45.the csa utilized conscription as well as relying on volunteers. iirc, men who owned over a certain number of slaves were exempt (at least for a while).
i always thought it referred to dixie carterSo will Alabama remove "Heart of Dixie" from it's license plates next? I mean, after all, the word "Dixie" infers racism.
Whenever I hear Dixie, I think, "Touchdown, Hokies."So will Alabama remove "Heart of Dixie" from it's license plates next? I mean, after all, the word "Dixie" infers racism.
Hey! Wait a minute. That was only my GGF. Not that long ago...Well said. I would recommend Jams McPherson's book, For Cause and Comrades. McPherson is a northerner and a fairly radical leftist (he does interviews on the World Socialist Web Site from time to time). McPherson examined, in a statistically rigorous manner, the letters from Union and Confederate soldiers. What he found surprised him. Both said they were "fighting for the Union of our fathers." Northern soldiers for this great Union of states, united. Confederates for a Union under a Constitution with limited powers for the central government, and a Union based on consent of the people of the states.
35% of Alabama families owned slaves in the 1860 census. What could possess the 65% non-slaveowning majority to support the Confederacy? Of not, some (like Earle's GGGF), opposed secession and then fought for the Union. Many opposed secession when it was up for debate. The vote on immediate unilateral secession was 61-39. Then Unionists said to themselves, "Well, I have had my say. My side lost. I am an Alabamian, so let's busy ourselves defending our state." Most delegates who had opposed secession retroactively signed the ordinance anyway as a show of unity. Only three delegates Henry C. Sanford of Cherokee County, Elliot P. Jones of Fayette County, and Robert Guttery of Walker County never signed the ordinance of secession. That hints at the proportions of unconditional Unionism and "I didn't think the time for secession had yet come" Unionism.
Have you not noticed that they've shrunk it to where it takes a magnifying glass to find it now? There has been a lot of sentiment for removing it, but it's a hot potato, politically...So will Alabama remove "Heart of Dixie" from it's license plates next? I mean, after all, the word "Dixie" infers racism.
It's more prominent on the "God Bless America" tag and the "Helping Schools" tag.
Apologies. My Civil War ancestors (on both sides of the question) were my GG GFs.Hey! Wait a minute. That was only my GGF. Not that long ago...
I'm not only older, my family goes back in long jumps - father born in 1895; mother in 1900; grandfather Self in 1860. My GGFs were born in the 1820s, mostly. Hard to imagine, I know, for most here. However, it greatly affected my upbringing. I grew up hearing family stories that most only read about in history books. (For example, fencing the hogs out, instead of in...)Apologies. My Civil War ancestors (on both sides of the question) were my GG GFs.
Growing up and at an early impressionable age, my family was visiting a family in Northern Alabama that raised hogs. They had a wire serving as a boundary keeping those hogs contained. That wire was electrified or whatever you call it. I didn't know that. I grabbed that wire and that shock sent me into the hog pen. A lesson learned.I'm not only older, my family goes back in long jumps - father born in 1895; mother in 1900; grandfather Self in 1860. My GGFs were born in the 1820s, mostly. Hard to imagine, I know, for most here. However, it greatly affected my upbringing. I grew up hearing family stories that most only read about in history books. (For example, fencing the hogs out, instead of in...)
Folks in the South used to fence in their crop fields and let your cows and hogs roam free (especially your hogs). Come November, you'd go hunt down your hogs and butcher what you needed. With a mild climate, no need to fence them in and build a barn to shelter them. They'd be fine on their own until killin' time.Growing up and at an early impressionable age, my family was visiting a family in Northern Alabama that raised hogs. They had a wire serving as a boundary keeping those hogs contained. That wire was electrified or whatever you call it. I didn't know that. I grabbed that wire and that shock sent me into the hog pen. A lesson learned.
Fencing hogs out! How did they keep up with those hogs? Did they roam and become wild hogs or Razorbacks in Arkansas?