Re: FSU QB De'Andre Johnson suspended indefinitely; source says he punched woman
What video are they watching?!?!?!
What video are they watching?!?!?!
Or neither - I am fine with either outcome. If the police or the girl drop these charges and FSU reinstates him I might snicker a bit but this one incident should not be allowed to ruin his future, IMO.Ive always said he will be back on the team. We really dont know the whole story... What I wanted to see is both of them getting charged...
Or neither - I am fine with either outcome. If the police or the girl drop these charges and FSU reinstates him I might snicker a bit but this one incident should not be allowed to ruin his future, IMO.
You may be fine allowing this young back on your team at OSU, but I'd prefer we not keep 'men' like this at Bama.Or neither - I am fine with either outcome. If the police or the girl drop these charges and FSU reinstates him I might snicker a bit but this one incident should not be allowed to ruin his future, IMO.
He hit the woman, and deserves to pay for that, but I do not believe that his life or football career should end over this incident. I really don't care whether or not you agree with me here - just stating my opinion.You may be fine allowing this young back on your team at OSU, but I'd prefer we not keep 'men' like this at Bama.
I agree completely. Plus, I don't believe than an incident like this, by itself, will ruin anybody's life.You may be fine allowing this young back on your team at OSU, but I'd prefer we not keep 'men' like this at Bama.
If he is convicted, his list of career options shrinks appreciably. Just looking at my life, neither my current nor former employer would hire someone with a violent conviction on their record. Background checks are pretty standard right now. Heck, since social media and web searches are now used by HR departments, a conviction may not even matter at this point.I agree completely. Plus, I don't believe than an incident like this, by itself, will ruin anybody's life.
I know two people who have convictions for similar violent crimes and both of them have decent to good careers. One is in my men’s group. When he was in his 20s, he was convicted (assault and battery, I think) for hitting a friend’s date because she attacked him when he took her keys away from him at a party because she was knee-walking drunk. He lost his temper and decked her. He was contacted by another company in his field last year and got an interview. When he met with them, he told them about the conviction in the first interview, admitted he was wrong and told them that he had never done anything similar before or since. They hired him and he got a raise and better benefits than his previous job. He told us he had done that in every interview he’d ever had. A few companies said, “hey, thanks for coming in” and showed him the door. But, most didn’t.If he is convicted, his list of career options shrinks appreciably. Just looking at my life, neither my current nor former employer would hire someone with a violent conviction on their record. Background checks are pretty standard right now. Heck, since social media and web searches are now used by HR departments, a conviction may not even matter at this point.
Here's the petition
In this town, too true. But if FSU really has cut ties with him, all bets are off.But, let’s be honest. There’s no way this dude is going to go to trial, much less be convicted if he does.
He didn't hit her to keep her from driving drunk. He'd already her keys. He hit her because he lost his temper. But, the reason doesn't really matter. My point was that he had a conviction and it hadn't ruined his life.Catfish....I think your friend's situation is different. Hitting someone to stop them from driving drunk is not the same as hitting someone when they were mad you cut in front of them at a bar.
Clearly a bunch of Phi Beta Kappa's eloquently expressing their outrage.Are the names of the people in those comments real? :conf2: