Please state your main reason(s) why (in your opinion) she would or would not make a good President.
I'll share my own thoughts later in the thread.
Thanks!
I'll share my own thoughts later in the thread.
Thanks!
It doesn't matter anyway, because elections are now a rigged game with a predetermined winner. The general electorate has no say in who will be the next occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.Unfortunately it is no longer which candidate is the best, it is which is the lesser of two evils. From an experience standpoint she is the equal of any Republican running and way more experienced than some. My biggest concern is what I perceive to be her mean spirited persona and lack of integrity. I will not vote for her and depending on which candidate the Republicans decide on I may sit this one out. I do not need a lecture on how voting is my privilege and duty.
What experience? She was given a US Senator seat, failed at a stint as Sec of State and lost a bid to win the Presidential nomination.Unfortunately it is no longer which candidate is the best, it is which is the lesser of two evils. From an experience standpoint she is the equal of any Republican running and way more experienced than some. My biggest concern is what I perceive to be her mean spirited persona and lack of integrity. I will not vote for her and depending on which candidate the Republicans decide on I may sit this one out. I do not need a lecture on how voting is my privilege and duty.
I totally agree. Lack of INTEGRITY. She wants to be the first woman President so bad, she'd sell her soul to Satan to get that lofty position and could give a rat's a… about the American people.If you made a list of all the traits you want in a President.....Honest, Trustworthy, Knowledgeable, Foreign Policy Success, Economic Success, Good Communicator......
She doesn't have any of them......
Do you want to hear that voice ringing in your ears for the next 4 to 8 years? I don't!No, but I'm not sure there's anyone in the ballpark of being a legitimate Presidential candidate that I would have said "Yes" about.
If you don't vote for someone else, you are in reality voting for HER. Anything's got to be better than her. People applaud her just as if they were ROBOTS. Don't people have a brain and can think for themselves?Unfortunately it is no longer which candidate is the best, it is which is the lesser of two evils. From an experience standpoint she is the equal of any Republican running and way more experienced than some. My biggest concern is what I perceive to be her mean spirited persona and lack of integrity. I will not vote for her and depending on which candidate the Republicans decide on I may sit this one out. I do not need a lecture on how voting is my privilege and duty.
You left out her experience as a First Lady. How can you be a First Lady when you're not even a lady IMHO.What experience? She was given a US Senator seat, failed at a stint as Sec of State and lost a bid to win the Presidential nomination.
With regards to experience I'd say Paul, Rubio, Cruz, Perry, Kasich, Jindal, Walker, Christie, Bush and Huckabee all have more than she does. At least they have all won multiple elections, and don't have a history of being a failure.
Yes, she is old, but name one accomplishment.
And no, Benghazi doesn't count.