Something good for the lawyer.Craig James gives me the creeps. Guess he wouldn't sue unless his lawyer said something good would happen?
“We just asked ourselves how Craig’s statements would play in our human resources department. He couldn’t say those things here.”
Yeah, I see where you are coming form here. I wonder if the state of employment is a state in which an employee can be fired for any cause.I think James is a helicopter dad and is indicative of everything wrong with child-rearing in modern western society, but I have a hard time believing he doesn't have reason to sue here.
If he went the EEOC route, which he probably did, he would have had 180 days to file with them (300, if the state has a similar agency). The EEOC hearing delay depends on their case load. If he doesn't like the disposition of the EEOC, he receives a "right to sue" letter, meaning suit in federal court. The limitation is then two years, unless the act were willful, which he's probably claiming, in which case it's three years, so he's probably not late. The interesting aspect of the case to me is trying to equate his position on gay rights to a religious view. I know people who are pro gay rights and also anti who are atheists...In many states, the statue of limitations for filing a civil suit is 2 years. He may have waited too long.
And what he said was not 'on air' at Fox.If he went the EEOC route, which he probably did, he would have had 180 days to file with them (300, if the state has a similar agency). The EEOC hearing delay depends on their case load. If he doesn't like the disposition of the EEOC, he receives a "right to sue" letter, meaning suit in federal court. The limitation is then two years, unless the act were willful, which he's probably claiming, in which case it's three years, so he's probably not late. The interesting aspect of the case to me is trying to equate his position on gay rights to a religious view. I know people who are pro gay rights and also anti who are atheists...
My thoughts exactly, not to mention his previous history with SMU. On top of that I never thought he was very good at his job.I think James is a helicopter dad and is indicative of everything wrong with child-rearing in modern western society, but I have a hard time believing he doesn't have reason to sue here.
Ahh, I had no idea about all this - definitely changes things.He was fired 48 hours after he was hired. They specifically stated at the time that his hire was never approved by corporate (the regional fox sports did it on their own where they were not allowed) and they mentioned at the time that it had nothing to do with his political statements and everything to do with how he abused his power at espn trying to get Mike Leach fired.
In this case, he has.. no case. And this is typical Craig James. He is a grade A jack (you know what) and always tries to position himself or his interests as being victimized. All the while he's actually the one at fault.He was fired 48 hours after he was hired. They specifically stated at the time that his hire was never approved by corporate (the regional fox sports did it on their own where they were not allowed) and they mentioned at the time that it had nothing to do with his political statements and everything to do with how he abused his power at espn trying to get Mike Leach fired. He has no leg to stand on and is simply trying salvage his life by positioning himself as a Christian Martyr. I'd be shocked if he isn't making the tier 2 conservative talk radio rounds with a new book inside of 3 months
This is what you're talking about, and you're correct.He was fired 48 hours after he was hired. They specifically stated at the time that his hire was never approved by corporate (the regional fox sports did it on their own where they were not allowed) and they mentioned at the time that it had nothing to do with his political statements and everything to do with how he abused his power at espn trying to get Mike Leach fired. He has no leg to stand on and is simply trying salvage his life by positioning himself as a Christian Martyr. I'd be shocked if he isn't making the tier 2 conservative talk radio rounds with a new book inside of 3 months
FIFY :wink:---snip---
And Todd Blackledge is a Christian and one hundred million times better an analyst than Craig James.
He'll get a settlement out of it...This is what you're talking about, and you're correct.
http://variety.com/2013/tv/news/fox...-his-conservative-religious-views-1200668039/
“Mr. James, while both experienced and knowledgeable, is a polarizing figure in the college sports community. Regrettably, the decision to use him was not properly vetted, and as a result he will no longer provide commentary on Fox Sports Southwest’s college football coverage.”
James was hired by Jon Heidtke, general manager of the regional sports network. His dismissal was announced two days after his sole Aug. 31 appearance.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...mes-fired-fox-sports-religious-discrimination
In addition to bringing little to the booth beyond tired clichés and obvious, mundane analysis, his credibility took a massive hit when he played a major role in getting former Texas Tech head coach Mike Leach fired.
When Fox Sports Southwest hired James as a studio analyst in on Aug. 30, the move drew a predictable disdainful reaction from the Internet. National executives at Fox Sports said they were not informed of the hiring before it happened, and they quickly snuffed out James' FSSW career after just one appearance on the network.
Btw - I'm a Christian, I don't think this rises to any level of anti-religious discrimination, and James was an awful analyst anyway.
And Todd Blackledge is a Christian and one hundred times better an analyst than Craig James.
Yup, probably. It is a sad litigious world we live in.He'll get a settlement out of it...