Agree...I think all 5 of our QB's have stronger arms than BS had last year. Shouldn't be a problem.I don't think arm strength is an issue with any of our 5 QB's.
Agree...I think all 5 of our QB's have stronger arms than BS had last year. Shouldn't be a problem.I don't think arm strength is an issue with any of our 5 QB's.
GMac wasn't a strong arm guy either but he won a few games.Agree...I think all 5 of our QB's have stronger arms than BS had last year.
Arm strength won't be an issue but GMac (even thought it was only 5 or 6 years ago) played in a different era of football. All of the rules changes and advantages that the offense has in today's game wouldn't allow that same type of team to be effective in the present game. You just can't play it safe on offense and lean on the defense like we did in 2009..GMac wasn't a strong arm guy either but he won a few games.
Arm strength won't be the issue.
Yeah, Cooper definitely made the deep throws look good for Sims. Blake just threw moon shots and Coop came up with it.Sims didn't have a gifted arm either but he looked good throwing it deep to Cooper after he burnt the corner to a crisp.
Bama scored 32.1 ppg in 2009, which is enough to win every game last year save the barn and ohio state (and only 4 ppg less than they scored last season).Arm strength won't be an issue but GMac (even thought it was only 5 or 6 years ago) played in a different era of football. All of the rules changes and advantages that the offense has in today's game wouldn't allow that same type of team to be effective in the present game. You just can't play it safe on offense and lean on the defense like we did in 2009.
That's my point. It wouldn't be enough to beat the better teams. And if you take out the cupcake teams from 2009 (FIU, North Texas, Chattanooga) it's more like 27 ppg which isn't bad but there is a reason why the identity of the team has changed - the game has changed..Bama scored 32.1 ppg in 2009, which is enough to win every game last year save the barn and ohio state (and only 4 ppg less than they scored last season).
I don't think CNS uses that structure strictly for the reason of getting guys ready for the NFL. I personally think he does it because it's just what he's comfortable with. The issue I have is (1) college players sometimes need that extra motivation to keep improving (they're not pros) and (2) it sometimes results in having starters in a game after the outcome is decided (injury risk). Looking back, I think it's come back to bite us at times. Just my opinion though...Of course not I was just being a smart .... I do think that a big point selling point is Bama will get you to the NFL and it would make sense that the structure is similar. Plus CNS has NFL experience and solicits input from his NFL contacts probably more than most college coaches.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry, but this is not even in the police jurisdiction of true.Yeah, Cooper definitely made the deep throws look good for Sims. Blake just threw moon shots and Coop came up with it.
I hear what you're saying, but offense and scoring points wasn't the reason for the OSU loss or the 44 points auburn scored.That's my point. It wouldn't be enough to beat the better teams. And if you take out the cupcake teams from 2009 (FIU, North Texas, Chattanooga) it's more like 27 ppg which isn't bad but there is a reason why the identity of the team has changed - the game has changed..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, the OSU loss and the 44 points given up to AU could be attributed to a number of things. I was just pointing out that just because a past player like GMac was successful back then doesn't mean that same type player could be successful now. The game has changed a lot since 2009. CNS has said as much. In one of his recent press conferences, he talked about how a player like Terrence Cody wouldn't really have a place in today's game. It's not a knock on Cody it's just a result of the pace/spread/HUNH and the rule changes, or lack of enforcement of certain rules, that gives the offense such an advantage.I hear what your saying, but offense and scoring points wasn't the reason for the OSU loss or the 44 points auburn scored.
Anyway, like you said, lack of arm strength won't be a factor for any of the current QB's.
Unless people figure out how to stop the balanced spread no-huddle w/ an athlete at QB, I'm pretty sure that the days of a game manager winning titles are over. You've simply must have either a playmaker or an extremely gifted passer at QB to keep up with the scoring pace. As good of a defense TCU has for stopping spread, they still got lit up in a few games and probably only stonewalled Ole Miss because they were below that competitive level due to injuries in the last part of the season. I'd be extremely surprised if this defensive unit can compete with the numbers set by the 2009 and 2011 units despite being right up there in pure NFL-ready talent. They may be really good for a 2015 defense, but the low numbers just aren't as likely. They're gonna give up more rushing yards due to broken plays where the QB can run. They're gonna give up more passing yards because teams are better designed to rack up yards in the air.Well, the OSU loss and the 44 points given up to AU could be attributed to a number of things. I was just pointing out that just because a past player like GMac was successful back then doesn't mean that same type player could be successful now. The game has changed a lot since 2009. CNS has said as much. In one of his recent press conferences, he talked about how a player like Terrence Cody wouldn't really have a place in today's game. It's not a knock on Cody it's just a result of the pace/spread/HUNH and the rule changes, or lack of enforcement of certain rules, that gives the offense such an advantage.
Using the same logic, I'm not sure that Bama can contend for championships with conservative QB play like we did in 2008 and 2009. You almost need a QB who can make plays on his own and takeover the game. If you look at the past 2 NC winners they both had playmakers at at the QB position (Winston and Cardale Jones). Last year all 4 QBs in the CFB were QBs who did more than just "manage" the game - Mariota, Winston, Blake Sims and Cardale Jones..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I probably took that too far. Blake did turn out to be way better than expected but Amari was spectacular. I don't exactly remember every statistic last year but it seems like when Cooper was limited Blake struggled in the passing game. He never seemed to spread the ball out when he needed to.Sorry, but this is not even in the police jurisdiction of true.
And this is why these forums exist - I contend that based on what I've heard about our OL and the defense overall, we could win it all with GM under center this year. It's a balancing act, and while GM wasn't amazing, he had his moments. That's all a well-balanced and talented team needs.Well, the OSU loss and the 44 points given up to AU could be attributed to a number of things. I was just pointing out that just because a past player like GMac was successful back then doesn't mean that same type player could be successful now.
I totally agree. Our style of football can still win and will win big. Let's not think just some new fad is going to overthrow true winning football.And this is why these forums exist - I contend that based on what I've heard about our OL and the defense overall, we could win it all with GM under center this year. It's a balancing act, and while GM wasn't amazing, he had his moments. That's all a well-balanced and talented team needs.
Remember, GM made it to the NFL...
it's possible but I guess I'm jadedAnd this is why these forums exist - I contend that based on what I've heard about our OL and the defense overall, we could win it all with GM under center this year. It's a balancing act, and while GM wasn't amazing, he had his moments. That's all a well-balanced and talented team needs.
Remember, GM made it to the NFL...