Non politicians also...Yeah, different politicians, same crap.
Tip of the day (rambling thought style): It's sad that we still have some 14 months until the presidential election - it means a year-plus of otherwise kind people posting and saying nasty things about the 'other team'.
I guess it makes people feel superior to attack other people's intellect based on how they feel about a particular subject. Just seems small-minded to me.
And guess what? Insulting the other 'team' (and yes, both sides are doing this like crazy) is why we have a county that's so politically divided. Keep it up - when you complain about there being no 'moderates' anymore, when you complain about the division amongst the voters - I'll hold up a mirror for you to gaze into...
How about stopping with the sound-byte attacks and try showing a *touch* of compassion, try understanding a *little bit* of what the other side thinks instead of taking things out of context and looking for whatever opportunity you can find to tear the other side down?
Just a thought.
Tried to link it with picture but as Emily Litella used to say, "Nev-ah miiiinnndd!!!"Can't see twitter links here at work. I do have to admit I tend to fall into what you guys are describing. I try to be reasonable, but it is very difficult to be when shouted at. Once that starts I try to just shut up, it isn't worth it.
Generally I think most people who actually participate in political arguments are not trying to convince the one they are arguing with, only those that may be listening.
What's that old one about never arguing with an idiot on the sidewalk. Passersby may not be able to tell which is the idiot...Can't see twitter links here at work. I do have to admit I tend to fall into what you guys are describing. I try to be reasonable, but it is very difficult to be when shouted at. Once that starts I try to just shut up, it isn't worth it.
Generally I think most people who actually participate in political arguments are not trying to convince the one they are arguing with, only those that may be listening.
Also known as PeleI am going to vote for Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.
NationalTitles15 I agree with this post 100 percent. I can quickly get my backup about somebodies opinion and blind myself to their view points and not consider them. To be honest some of my views have been changed by some very intelligent posters on this board. I feel like I go to school many times from the things I have learned just reading posts made from many posters especially when they get in a debate. But at the end of the day I feel like I could go out and have a few beers with anybody on this board and have a great time. This is what makes this site great. One thing I do know is not to take anything to personal on here.Winning a political argument is near impossible because anyone who cares enough to argue about politics is usually convinced they have all the information they will ever need and have given all the thought they will ever need and have done all the listening they will ever need to do. Many are so passionate about a few issues that no other issue matter nearly as much. And I dare say many have never given an ounce of thought to the underlying presumptions and principles on which their political opinions are based. We do have a number of posters here who not only go against the grain, but are able to articulate well. Still, even with a well-reasoned argument it is up to the listener to actually listen and evaluate and be willing to change. Of course, that also means even the well-reasoned and articulate may be so entrenched as to avoid further listening and thought. I have actually changed my opinion on a number of issues, usually not in the heat of argument, though. Stubbornness and pride are high hurdles. We want to feel that we came to our own conclusion. /rambling
Very well said. Most political discussions are doomed from the start for the reasons you stated - one of both side have their minds made up. Worse, some see the world through such a rigid lens that every issue must be "left" or "right" and that guarantees no thinking...Winning a political argument is near impossible because anyone who cares enough to argue about politics is usually convinced they have all the information they will ever need and have given all the thought they will ever need and have done all the listening they will ever need to do. Many are so passionate about a few issues that no other issue matter nearly as much. And I dare say many have never given an ounce of thought to the underlying presumptions and principles on which their political opinions are based. We do have a number of posters here who not only go against the grain, but are able to articulate well. Still, even with a well-reasoned argument it is up to the listener to actually listen and evaluate and be willing to change. Of course, that also means even the well-reasoned and articulate may be so entrenched as to avoid further listening and thought. I have actually changed my opinion on a number of issues, usually not in the heat of argument, though. Stubbornness and pride are high hurdles. We want to feel that we came to our own conclusion. /rambling
I think we do a remarkable job of staying away from that, because that's the one rule - personal remarks - which are not allowed site-wide. Occasionally someone may stray over the line, but, by and large, we manage to disagree agreeably...NationalTitles15 I agree with this post 100 percent. I can quickly get my backup about somebodies opinion and blind myself to their view points and not consider them. To be honest some of my views have been changed by some very intelligent posters on this board. I feel like I go to school many times from the things I have learned just reading posts made from many posters especially when they get in a debate. But at the end of the day I feel like I could go out and have a few beers with anybody on this board and have a great time. This is what makes this site great. One thing I do know is not to take anything to personal on here.
Theres some really interesting sociology work being done regarding the way that we consume our news now affects our personal bias. The TLDR is that news/social sites/even message boards allow for most people to selectively choose communities that have relatively similar viewpoints, which only strengthens their personal bias as it allows each community to generate their own accepted source of truth. You can see this in many different areas, but it is probably most exemplified by how many people "KNOW" that so and so had this happen, or "KNOW" that this is the "REAL" way it went down because they know a guy who knows a guy. The reasoning behind this is that in the past there were three outlets of information that everyone had access to and if you watched the news, everyone got relatively the same set of "facts". (This doesn't take periodicals into account as in the relatively recent past 30 years, you could really only count on the nightly national news as the singularly widely available and disseminated free source of information)Very well said. Most political discussions are doomed from the start for the reasons you stated - one of both side have their minds made up. Worse, some see the world through such a rigid lens that every issue must be "left" or "right" and that guarantees no thinking...
*thanks*, and *likes*Theres some really interesting sociology work being done regarding the way that we consume our news now affects our personal bias. The TLDR is that news/social sites/even message boards allow for most people to selectively choose communities that have relatively similar viewpoints, which only strengthens their personal bias as it allows each community to generate their own accepted source of truth. You can see this in many different areas, but it is probably most exemplified by how many people "KNOW" that so and so had this happen, or "KNOW" that this is the "REAL" way it went down because they know a guy who knows a guy. The reasoning behind this is that in the past there were three outlets of information that everyone had access to and if you watched the news, everyone got relatively the same set of "facts". (This doesn't take periodicals into account as in the relatively recent past 30 years, you could really only count on the nightly national news as the singularly widely available and disseminated free source of information)
Now search engines, facebook, and other aggregators all realize that if you want to keep customers, you keep them happy by giving them the information they like, not necessarily all the information on the subject. Specifically, information that already falls within their confirmation bias. You can actually test this. Have two people, from relatively different areas of the political spectrum do searches on google. As long as you haven't cleared your cookies, or are still logged into your google account, you will get different results for the same search terms all based upon what you clicked for other past similar searches.
Agree. In fact, I believe we share much of the blame. i.e., a polity gets the leadership it deserves. I say that as one who is apolitical.......
But perhaps we share some of the blame for not insisting on more consistency from ourselves? It's sort of hypocritical to demand politicians be consistent when we ourselves aren't. (I try to be, and I see some of the folks here who do, too).